ACOMSDave

Community Journalist

  • Home
  • Community Journalist
  • Events
  • Media Page and Press Kit
    • Projects and Work
  • Resources & Documents
    • LGBTQ+ Support Groups and Documents
  • NIGRA
  • Archives
  • Contact

ACOMSDave Community Journalist

Britain’s concentration camps for gay men

22/01/2016 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

 Yes, you have read correctly,  Britain’s concentration camps for gay men did exist.

Britain’s concentration camps for gay men

Auschwitz Concentration Camp

Historian and author Simon Webb writes about the gay men who were kept in concentration camps in the UK.

We are most of us aware that gay men were routinely sent to the concentration camps of the Third Reich for no other reason than that their sexuality was unacceptable to the Nazis.  A special section of the Gestapo, the Reich Central Office for the Combating of Homosexuality and Abortion was set up by Heinrich Himmler in 1936, with the avowed intention of rooting out homosexuality wherever it was to be found in Germany.
In Britain during the 1930s and 1940s, gay men were certainly imprisoned for what was then classified as criminal behaviour, but few people know that there were also concentration camps operating in this country between 1940 and 1946, to which one special category of gay men was sent.
In 1940, following the fall of France, an estimated 30,000 Polish soldiers arrived in Britain; men who had fought alongside the French army to stave off the invading Germans.

They were led by a former Prime Minister of Poland, General Wladyslaw Sikorski. Fearing that this country was itself about to be invaded, these troops were rushed to Scotland to defend the east coast against possible landings of German troops launched from Norway.  Britain was thus indebted to the new Polish government-in-exile, which was led by Sikorski. Without the Polish troops, Scotland would have been all but undefended against the German attack.

General Sikorski was not universally popular with his fellow countrymen and opposition groups emerged which threatened his position as leader of the Polish government and commanding officer of the tens of thousands of Polish soldiers.  The solution, at least as far as Sikorski was concerned, was simple. These enemies would have to be neutralised.

Britain’s concentration camps for gay men

General Sikorski – the man responsible for the concentration camps in Scotland

On 18 July 1940, General Sikorski told the Polish National Council in London: “There is no Polish judiciary. Those who conspire will be sent to a concentration camp.”
Since he and the others were likely to be in Britain for the foreseeable future, it was plain that the concentration camp of which he talked, would be set up in this country.
General Marian Kukiel, appointed Commander of Camps and Army Units in Scotland by Sikorski, received a secret order relating to what was described as, ‘an unallocated grouping of officers’, who were to be held in a special camp.

Rothesay on the Isle of Bute, before the Second World War. The first Polish concentration camp was established here in 1940

Life inside the concentration camps of Scotland – The Jewish Post

Not only did Sikorski wish to see senior officers and political rivals who might challenge his authority tucked out of the way, but he also wished to purge the Polish army of what he termed, ‘Person of improper moral level’ (homosexuals, Jews etc).

General Sikorski was an austere and autocratic leader and had very strong ideas on what constituted acceptable behaviour.
He loathed drunks, gamblers, the sexually promiscuous and especially homosexuals.
So it was that along with all the men he feared might interfere with his leadership of the Polish government-in-exile, generals and senior politicians from pre-war Poland, Sikorski decided to lock up many other men of whose conduct he happened to disapprove.  The site chosen for this, the first concentration camp to be established in Britain, was the Isle of Bute.

The inmates of the new camp were at first housed in tents. Not all were military men.  Among the first to be imprisoned, there were men such as Michael GrazynskI, President of the Polish Scouting Association. Another important prisoner was Marian Zyndram-Kosciakowlski; who was Prime Minister of Poland from 1935-1939.  The atmosphere in the camp on the Isle of Bute was toxic.
The senior officers, no fewer than twenty generals were held captive there at various times, refused to have anything to do with what was known as the ‘pathological cases’; I.e. the drunks and homosexuals.

This led to the development of a sub-culture of gay prisoners, who tended to stick together; a situation which represented something of a scandal to those running the camp and it was decided that the ‘pathological’ types should be separated from the political prisoners.

A new and harsher camp was set up on the Scottish mainland at Tighnabruich and the gay prisoners transferred there.  This village voted in 2002 ‘the prettiest village in Argyll, Lomand and Stirlingshire’, is on the coast, facing the Isle of Bute. The commandant of the new camp was Colonel Wladyslaw Spalek.  How was it possible that the Polish government-in-exile was allowed to operate concentration camps in this way, without any objections from the British government?  After the evacuation of Dunkirk in 1940, the British needed all the help they could get to defend their country against a German invasion.  The Allied Forces Act was accordingly passed that same year.  This gave the governments-in-exile of Poland, Norway, The Netherlands, Belgium and Czechoslovakia the legal right to raise their own independent forces from among citizens of their countries resident in Britain.  Their army camps and military bases were to be regarded as the sovereign territory of the various countries concerned and, as such, immune from interference by the British police or any other authorities.

How this worked in practice was that if General Sikorski took a dislike to any Polish person living in this country, he was able to draft that person into his army and then have him arrested by the military police and taken off into captivity as either a deserter or mutineer.  This neat little trick meant that any Polish man whose behaviour, sexual or otherwise, did not meet with Sikorski’s approval was apt to find himself being shipped off to Scotland and held behind barbed wire.  In another grim echo of the situation in Nazi Germany, not only were gay men marked down for imprisonment in the camps; communists and Jews were also likely to fall foul of the Polish government in London.

One of the most famous prisoners on the Isle of Bute was the writer, journalist and biographer of Stalin; Isaac Deutscher.  Although born in Poland, Deutscher, a Jew, had emigrated to Britain where he made a life for himself before the outbreak of war in 1939.  In 1940, following Dunkirk and the Fall of France, he travelled to Scotland to volunteer for the Polish army which was now based there.  No sooner had he joined up, than Deutscher found himself arrested and sent to the camp at Rothesay.  Being both a Jew and also a communist, he was regarded as a dangerous subversive by senior figures in General Sikorski’s administration.  Rumours began to circulate among MPs in London that something unsavoury was going on in Scotland.
Names began to emerge of Polish citizens being held for no apparent reason in secret installations.  In all cases, the men being detained seemed to be Jews.
On February 19 1941, for example, Samuel Silverman, MP for Nelson and Colne, raised the question in the House of Commons of two Jewish brothers called Benjamin and Jack Ajzenberg. These men had been picked up by Polish soldiers in London and taken to a camp in Scotland.  The following year, Adam McKinley, MP for Dumbartonshire in Scotland, asked in the House what was happening on the Isle of Bute.  The government, which had no wish to upset a valuable ally, refused to provide any information.
Under the terms of the Allied Forces Act, the British had, in any case, no legal right to interfere in what was happening at camps and army bases being operated by the Polish Government in Exile.
Having found that they were apparently able to operate concentration camps on British soil with complete impunity, the Polish leadership opened new facilities for holding political prisoners and others at Kingledoors, Auchetarder and Inverkeithing.  The last-named of these was located just eight miles from Edinburgh.

These were dreadful places that looked like the traditional idea of a concentration camp; barbed wire fences, primitive accommodation and watchtowers containing armed guards.  Those living nearby heard rumours of maltreatment, starvation, beatings and even the death of inmates.  In several cases, the reports of deaths by shooting turned out to be quite true. On 29 October 1940, for instance, a Jewish prisoner called Edward Jakubowsky was shot dead in the camp in Kingledoors, for allegedly insulting a guard.

The Polish camps were to operate for another six years.  Increasing unease on the part of British MPs and others led to questions being asked in the House about what precisely was going on in Scotland.  Matters came to a head, on the 14th June 1945. Robert McIntyre, the Member for the Scottish constituency of Motherwell, stood up in the House and asked the following question:

“Will the government make provision for the inspection, at any time, by representatives of the various districts of Scotland of any penal settlements, concentration camps, detention barracks, prisons, etc. within their area, whether these institutions are under the control of the British, American, French or Polish governments or any other authority; and for the issuing of a public report by those representatives?”

This caused something of a sensation; the suggestion that there were concentration camps in Scotland.

That same day, Moscow Radion made the same accusation, citing the detention of a Jewish academic called Dr Jan Jagodzinski in a camp at Inverkeithing.
This provoked widespread interest and the world’s press began to ask what was happening in these Polish camps.

Britain’s concentration camps for gay menIn an attempt to defuse the anger being felt, the Polish government-in-exile agreed to allow journalists to visit the camp at Inverkeithing.  This action did little to reassure anybody. The first prisoner to whom reporters spoke turned out to be yet another Jew, by the name of Josef Dobosiewicz.  He alleged that a prisoner had recently been shot dead in the camp. The commandant conceded that this was true, but claimed that the dead man had been trying to escape.

Once again, the local police had been powerless to act, under the terms of the Allied Forces Act.

A year after the Second World war had come to an end, the camps were still in existence and still seemingly holding Jews.
On 16 April 1946, the MP for Fife West, William Gallacher, asked the Secretary of State for War to look into the case of two more Jews being held in a camp in Scotland; David Glicenstein and Shimon Getreudhendler.

It is impossible at this late stage to know precisely what was happening in these camps.  That they were in fact concentration camps is undeniable; that after all is what general Sikorski had announced that he would be setting up.  We have no idea at all how many gay men were sent to the camps, nor how long they were held there.  The same is true for the statistics relating to communists and Jews.
What is beyond dispute is that from 1940 onwards, men in this country were being arrested and taken to concentration camps for no other reason than that they were gay.

Simon Webb is the author of ‘British Concentration Camps: A Brief History from 1900 – 1975′.

 

Links:

  • Crackdown on Camps

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia, Community Journalist, History Tagged With: barbed wire, Britain's concentration camps, concentration, concentration camps, gay, history, Isle of But, LGBT, men, persecution, politics, Tents

Our Libraries

24/09/2015 By ACOMSDave

NI LibrariesI am a passionate believer in education and the access to information; and an article published in the New Orleans Advocate (When we build, improve libraries, we invest in the young, the poor, our overall quality of life) indicates that communities across Louisiana have realised the potential of libraries to develop people and provide a resource to everyone.

I also am a realist, in that we all have to work within budgets, but the short sightedness of the current government’s policies regarding provision of monies for libraries and its resources can clearly be seen in the table below.

Effectively the budget has been decreased by 3.9% per head in Northern Ireland for a resource which enables education, mobility and provides the population with a means of developing and red-developing its ability to meet the needs of the workplace.

Some would believe that this is short-sightedness – I do!

 

Public spending per head for Northern Ireland, 2009/10 to 2013/14 £ per head in real terms (2013/14 prices)

       

 

2009/10

2010/11

2011/12

2012/13

2013/14

Northern Ireland 11,408 11,173 11,051 11,059

10,961

 

But, we also have a school library service, and details regarding its expenditure has been impossible to ascertain in terms of expenditure comparison, however a report from CILIP did have some very telling information, and in particular the Table B5: Adequacy of Current Stock and Resources, which indicates that 7 of the 9 authorities who had responded felt it was poor or adequate for its needs.  The question must be asked is that sufficient for our children?

Snap 2015-09-24 at 11.46.43

 

Research information:

  1. House of Commons Library – BRIEFING PAPER Number 04033, 19 May 2015
  2. The economic value of public libraries
  3. The impact of austerity on schools and children’s education and well-being
  4. CILIP – School libraries in the UK A worthwhile past, a difficult present – and a transformed future? 

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: development, education, libraries, school libraries, services

Cybercrime Variation

18/09/2015 By ACOMSDave

Hi Everyone

Yesterday I received an email which stated that I had not signed and replied to a contract that I had been sent for a business supplier.

As I didn’t remember seeing any such contract or requesting one, I sent a short email requesting details.,

What I received back was a variation of the ‘Banking Cybercrime’ scam.

Here is a short excerpt of the email:

I am Mr. Chen Mulan a nationality of Taiwan and bank officer with the International bank of Taipei (Bank SinoPac) Taiwan. Let me give you a detailed description of what is in this transaction for us. In June 2001, My late client  Muhsin Akmosh Al-Timimi (An Iraqi Crude oil merchant), who is a nationality of Iraq, made a numbered fixed deposit of Eighteen Million Three hundred Thousand United State Dollars ($18.3 million United States dollars) for 18 calendar months…

I have reported this to the PSNI Cybercrime unit and retained the emails in a separate folder for their attention.

I will keep you updated of developments.


 

 

Filed Under: Community Journalist

Politics and Cyber Crime

16/09/2015 By ACOMSDave

computer-hackerOver the last fifteen years I have written various articles regarding ‘big brother’ and the encroachment of our civil liberties.  I have written on the time when police thought they had carte blanc rights to stop and seize the cameras of anyone who was taking photographs of marches etc. that police had been involved in; this was followed by a piece on how the government had been using GCHQ to  monitor communications of vastly more of the population that we had been aware of.

Now we are all aware of hacking and how it has developed both in terms of attacks on government and private businesses, and as important hacking as a tool of criminals; but what is probably not known is that around the world that most governments are developing hacking as a tool of warfare.

I accept that goverment needs to protect us, and in doing so needs the skillsets of hacking in its armoury, but this does not mean they should not be monitored.  Steve Rangers article ‘The new art of war: How trolls, hackers and spies are rewriting the rules of conflict‘, has been well researched and allows us to understand current and future develops.

I hope you enjoy the article, and that you will let me know what your thoughts are by commenting.

081203-N-2147L-390 NORFOLK, Va. (Dec. 3, 2008) Sailors on the watch-floor of the Navy Cyber Defense Operations Command monitor, analyze, detect and defensively respond to unauthorized activity within U.S. Navy information systems and computer networks. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communications Specialist 1st Class Corey Lewis/Released)

NORFOLK, Va. (Dec. 3, 2008) Sailors on the watch-floor of the Navy Cyber Defense Operations Command monitor, analyze, detect and defensively respond to unauthorized activity within U.S. Navy information systems and computer networks. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communications Specialist 1st Class Corey Lewis/Released)

Further reading:

  • 21 Terrifying Cyber Crime Statistics by VPN Geeks

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: cyber crime, defence, hackers

Greg Louganis On How His Life Has Changed for the Better

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

 

With the documentary about his hardships debuting on HBO, the Olympic athlete reflects on downsizing his life and finding happiness.

 
BY JERRY PORTWOOD
AUGUST 03 2015 3:35 PM EDT
 
The documentary Greg Louganis: Back on Board was a hit at festivals a year ago, but with its debut on HBO Sports this week, the heartbreaking story of one of America’s greatest athletes will finally reach millions of households who may not be aware of the diver’s ups and downs since he was in the spotlight.
Directed by Cheryl Furjanic and produced by Furjanic and Will Sweeney, the film about the four-time Olympic gold medalist comes at a pivotal time when acute attention is being paid to LGBT athletes, especially after Caitlyn Jenner came out as trans this year and the debut of the docuseries I Am Cait on E! is creating heightened trans awareness. The fact that some have questioned whether Jenner deserved her medals after the revelation, is a sore point for Louganis as well since people had tried to take his medals after coming out as HIV-positive. But it was Louganis’s husband, Johnny Chaillot who informed Louganis of the similarity.
“I had no idea since I don’t read my press,” Louganis explains, while sipping coffee in a Midtown New York City hotel with his dog Dobby at his feet. “I had competed in the ’88 Seoul Olympics while HIV-positive, and some people said I shouldn’t have been allowed in the country. I’m kind of glad I didn’t know it, but it made me think: How can you deny somebody, especially a physical achievement like that? You can’t take that performance away. It stands on its own.”
Chaillot and Louganis were married in California in the fall of 2013 — and it’s a happy turning point included in the film — and since then, Chaillot has helped Louganis get many of his affairs in order and donated a trove of memorabilia to the National LGBT Museum, which plans to open its doors in New York City in 2019. “They now have the largest collection of Greg Louganis memorabilia collection in the world,” Chaillot says. “Hopefully they are going to do a preview of Greg’s stuff since next year since it’s an Olympic year. We kept some of the bigger items” — including medals from each of the Olympics — “But we donated items like Speedos he wore in competitions and the 1988 sweater he wore in Seoul, so these things would be in a place where the whole world can see them.”
Since the film begins with Louganis in dire financial straits and about to lose his Malibu home, we wanted to know how his life has changed since the filming took place and find out where he’s living these days.
Out: Was it odd that the film starts with you and the house and your financial situation?
Greg Louganis: When I first saw it, I got a little nervous. I think it was important to tell the story because it wasn’t unique: This was happening across the country with loans and the 2006 black mold scare. I know how empowering it can be to know that someone else has been through that. I think it was an important story to tell within the documentary. But we sold the house last year. It was kind of bittersweet, I lived there 29 years. But now we’re completely out of debt. I was able to pay my taxes, my loan, paid for our wedding. Now we have a whole new fresh start.

Greg Louganis

In many ways, the message of the film seems to be a cautionary tale for athletes and families of athletes to make them aware that you aren’t going to be “golden” your entire life.
Right. That’s why I wanted to talk about mentoring U.S. divers. It’s not just about getting to the Olympics and performing well at the games. What happens after? When you retire from your sport, you’re still pretty young and you almost lose your identity. To go through that process of: Now what do I do? I didn’t know what my passion was going to be. I’ve seen it with the other athletes, you reach a certain age, and you need something else to move to.
One of the more poignant lines from the documentary is when you explain that, having a coach who told you what to do, you never had to think about how to live your life. Do you have any advice for people who have that sort of relationship so it doesn’t necessarily translate into other parts of their lives?
My coach was trustworthy, and I trusted him. We were together for 10 years, so I trust him implicitly. I always knew he had my best interest at heart, but in the “real world” not everyone is trustworthy, so that was a real hard lesson for me to learn. I kept making the same mistakes again and again, but I needed to learn those lessons. I don’t have any regrets, but I would like, in an ideal world, for other athletes and performers and whomever would hear that and not make the same mistakes. Part of that is learning what questions to ask or doing the research, now that we have the Internet, you can look people up and do background checks.
SLIDESHOW: Champions: Heroes, Past and Present, Who Play For Our Team
One of the other details revealed in the doc that I didn’t know about: You never had a Wheaties box. I know it’s not the biggest accoldate, but I never realized that you were overlooked in that way.
You know what, I didn’t either until I was working with Cheryl on the documentary, and we were at the International Swimming Hall of Fame where they had all the Wheaties boxes lined up of all the aquatic athletes. It’s box after box after box, of some rather obscure names, and I’m going, “Oh my god, I am nowhere in that group.”
What did that feel like to realize that oversight?
Well that first came out with the book in ’95. I thought, Oh yeah, whatever. I didn’t really know the significance of it until we started working on Back on Board and I saw all the boxes and realized, I’m not there. That was the first time it really struck me what the significance of that was. I realized why people were upset.
But two of the reasons you thought were that there were rumors that you were gay or you felt you weren’t “All-American” enough. But that made me think about people wondering if that would affect Caitlyn Jenner in some way: Would Wheaties do something now that she came out as transgender or would the OIC take away her medals?
I marched in the opening ceremonies with Bruce in 1976. I was on the Tour of Champions with Medco, and they always put me with Bruce and Mark [Spitz], and between the two of them I couldn’t get a word in edgewise. I know these people. Then the whole Kardashian thing. I don’t watch TV so I don’t know, I haven’t seen the show.
I wasn’t sharing the Caitlyn sensationalism angle, but I read about trans-exploitation, a term I had heard before, and discussed it with Johnny and what the implications can be. So that was news to me. I did Larry Kramer’s Just Say No with Alexandra Billings, and Alexandra taught me so much about her journey transitioning. That’s been my education. The thing about it is we talk about the LGBT community, but we’re really not informed as a community. I know a lot about the G, and I have wonderful relations with the L in LGBT, but the B, I’m not quite as sure, but I have a better sensitivity to it by viewing sexuality as much more fluid. But I knew nothing about the T in LGBT, so to do that show with Alexandra, I had an education and how to talk respectfully. It’s almost like learning a whole new language. Also, RuPaul is a friend. And RuPaul, he or she, it’s whatever I’m dressed as, that’s how you address me.
Personally, I kind of bristle with the whole “girlfriend” and “she” thing. Someone called me “Oh, girl” or “her” or something like that. And I said, “Excuse me?” I said I’m a man and I’m proud to be a man. I appreciate camp and there’s a time and a place for that but to somebody you don’t know, it can be rather inappropriate.
RELATED | VOWS: Greg Louganis & Johnny Chaillot
One of the happiest moments takes place after we see you selling off your memorabilia and medals to save your house, and then you meet Johnny, and you find happiness. Was that something you think the filmmakers were looking for?
I wasn’t in the editing process at all. I relinquished all the creative control, but having built that relationship with Cheryl, she was like my therapist who I would go to. And the crew, too. They lived with us through this, too. One of the crewmembers was going through the same thing I was going through. I just reconnected with him recently and I found out he was also able to get out of the debt and sell his house and he’s moved on.
Now Johnny and I are very cautious about her finances. We’re living well within our means so we can put money aside. We know where we’re at right now is temporary [Chaillot’s one-bedroom Beverly Hills apartment, which he describes as cramped, but “very Gloria Swanson.] It’s affordable and we don’t have to worry where the next job is coming from. We don’t have that pressure. With that lifted, it enables us to have much more freedom.

Links:

  • Greg Louganis – 30 Years Later: The Same Cereal Box, a New Perspective

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia, Community Journalist, TV programme reviews Tagged With: Back Story, Diver, Greg Louganis, HBO, Living the dream, sportsman

The 4Cs Model of Effective Communication – part 3

12/07/2015 By ACOMSDave

The Second C is ‘Connection’.

Connection with an idea

 

Making connections is what we all strive to do daily, whether it is with our partner, our children, or with our extended family; but then we move out into the ‘big’ world and here we seem to forget the rules we have used at home, and seem to think that they are put together differently for the ‘real’ world of business.

They are not!

Making a connection with a communicated idea or message  means not only that the audience (the people who you have written for, or who you have made that telephone call to; or even just stopped and had a conversation with)  get it, but that it resonates with them.  It strikes a chord.  It has, somehow, become part of their being.

Messages and ideas, in whatever form presented, that make connections are on their way to truly meaning something which is intrinsic to the your audience; and more importantly it will lead to new behaviours and actions.

I never dreamed about success

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: 4Cs, connection, ideas

When should journalists take on the role of activists?

22/06/2015 By ACOMSDave

Are journalists who are silent on issues of privacy and net neutrality doing their jobs correctly, asks Dan Gillmor of the First Amendment Coalition

journalism.co.uk  Posted: 19 June 2015 By: Catalina Albeanu
Questions blackboard

Credit: Thinkstock

Objectivity is one of the pillars of journalism, ingrained into a newsroom’s editorial processes and taught to trainee journalists from the very first day.

But there is also space for journalists to take a stand on what they believe in, said Dan Gillmor, board member of the First Amendment Coalition and Guardian columnist.

“I don’t believe objectivity really exists,” he said at the GEN Summit today. “It’s kind of a unicorn, it’s a nice idea…”

“But even as we are worshipping at this altar of objectivity or neutrality, there’s some issues where, as journalists, we simply cannot be neutral, cannot be objective and should not try to be.”

He highlighted the freedoms which are under threat in the digital world, freedoms that are essential to journalists and citizens: freedom to associate, collaborate and innovate, all intertwined with the freedom of the press.

He said there is “an attack on the decentralised fundamental nature of the internet” from governments and corporations, as well as mass-surveillance, as revealed by the NSA leaks of Edward Snowden.

“If we’re ok with that, are we doing our jobs correctly as journalists?” he asked delegates.

“We journalists should be using encryption all the time, but we shouldn’t stop there.

“We should be teaching encryption to our audiences, helping them use it themselves.”

He pointed to more issues journalists have failed to deal with “in a fundamental way” while discussing how to fit in with “the world of Facebook”, such as the threat to net neutrality in Europe, for example.

The media industry should recognise the idea of “activism as journalism”, a connection that makes many uncomfortable – some of the finest reporting can be done by advocacy groups and NGOs like Human Rights Watch, he said.

There are however many activists who are pushing out propaganda, but “there is a great role for activism in journalism”.

“Please be activists for those core freedoms… Please campaign against control and please campaign for more open systems and technologies than the ones that are being created around us,” he told delegates

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: encryption, journalism, press freedom

Viva Espana

18/06/2015 By ACOMSDave

This is my first blog entry in relation to my dream to move and live in Spain.  Over time I hope to develop my knowledge of Spain, its culture, customs and its language.  In the meantime I will keep my eyes open for appropriate and interesting articles to start the ball rolling.  Call To ActionAre you moving or living in Spain, if you have interesting stories or have information then please pass it on to ACOMSDave and his Viva Espana.

 

Want a great work-life balance? Then head to Spain

Author: Ian Clover  |  June 15th, 2015

There are many Brits who live on the Costa del Sol who never intended for their extended holiday to turn into a decade-long spell in Spain. Those early, carefree days of life in Spain can stretch out across the long and languid summer like the calm seas of the glistening Mediterranean, but there is always that nagging voice inside saying “this will not – cannot – last!”

But while expats who treat life on the Costa del Sol as one long, sun-kissed holidayare in for a shock, those prepared to balance living life with knuckling down will find that Spain is actually one of the best places in the world to strike the right balance…

A recent report published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has found that Spain ranks second behind Denmark at delivering the best work-life balance in the world.

Denmark is a fine country, with excellent public services, high wages and superb beer, but its climate gives Scotland a run for its money in the ‘bleak and chilly’ stakes. Spain, blessed with abundant sunshine and the highest average temperatures in Europe, is a fantastic place in which to enjoy the ideal work-life balance.

According to the study, Spaniards who work full time actually devoted a greater portion of their day to personal care and pursuing leisure activities than any other nation in the world, racking up an impressive 16 hours a day doing things like sports, hobbies, dining, sleeping, meeting with friends or spending time with family.

What’s more, just six per cent of Spaniards worked more than 50 hours a week. And if you’re thinking that this may play a part in Spain’s recent economic woes, then think again – rich, stable, prosperous Denmark has just two per cent of its workforceclocking up more than 50 hours at work each week.

“Finding a suitable balance between work and life is a challenge for all workers, especially working parents,” said the OECD report. “The ability to successfully combine work, family commitments and personal life is important for the well-being of all members in a household.

“Evidence suggests that long work hours may impair personal health, jeopardise safety and increase stress.”

The report formed part of the OECD’s ‘Better Life Index’, which ranks the quality of living in all OECD member nations. Spain scored highly in many other areas, including housing – the country has some of Europe’s finest, most affordable property – community and health, with Spaniards living longer than most other nationalities in the world.

However, there is still room for improvement, with Spain performing below-average on environmental quality, education and income. These things, however, are all improving as the country continues its economic recovery.

The finer things in life – friends, family, health and happiness – Spain already gets right, although most Spaniards would admit that an extra bit of cash in their pocket each month would not go amiss…

 

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: Espana, hola, Spain

The 4Cs Model of Effective Communication – part II

18/06/2015 By ACOMSDave

Communications - The 4C's

Communications – The 4C’s

The First C: Comprehension

In my introduction to Effective Communication (part I), I referred to the 4C’s of effective communication,  and how we need to be aware of these and how to use these 4C’s in our daily lives.  Today I am going to clarify the first C – ‘Comprehension’.  To comprehend means  do you and your reader understand what has been written; is the main idea or point understood.

Lets look at a few examples of badly written communications:

 

  • Example 1.
    • he appeal of the view that a work of art expresses nothing unless what it expresses can be put into words can be reduced by setting beside it another view, no less popular in the theory of art, that a work of art has no value if what it expresses can be put into words.
  • Example 2
    • Ms. W!!!!Wazzup? girl tell me what we have to do for Friday bcuz I take 3 claeses and wrk 15 hrs/wk and I dont have time 2 git to a comupter to look n e thing up I rlly like your cls bcuz your funny well let me know cuz im a rlly gd stdt and need a A in you’re cls.[no signature]

      – See more at: http://www.teachingcollegeenglish.com/2009/07/26/examples-of-poor-email/#sthash.mA8iKyQg.dpuf

Here are three tips for better comprehension:

  • Make the message clear and sharp
  • Repetition helps.  Tell them what you’re going to tell them; next, tell them; and then tell them what you told them
  • Keep it simple – don’t go too deep

The old adage of KISS – Keep it Short and Simple

 

Filed Under: Community Journalist

The 4Cs Model of Effective Communication – part I

13/05/2015 By ACOMSDave

When you are writing for your business, whether it be for your blog, your Facebook page, or your emails, the need for effective communication is vital.  You need to practise the elements of the 4Cs, and the more you practice, the better you will become.

The good news for everyone is, that you don’t have to be an expert writer or advertising genius to accomplish messaging mastery.  The 4Cs model is easy to understand, simple to apply, and works with any piece of writing you have to do.

The 4Cs consist of the following four ideas, and over the coming weeks, I will expand on each idea to make mastery a foregone conclusion:

 

Does the Audience Get The Message – the main idea?Apple

 

 

 

Bob MarleyDoes the audience ‘get it’ – does the message resonate with them? Is there a connection?

 

 

 

Justin BeiberDo the audience believe in who is saying it? Is it credible?

 

CricketDo the audience ‘catch’ the message – is it contagious?

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: 4Cs, clarity, effective communications, purpose, writing

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • Next Page »

Categories

Copyright ACOMSDave.com © 2026