ACOMSDave

Community Journalist

  • Home
  • Community Journalist
  • Events
  • Media Page and Press Kit
    • Projects and Work
  • Resources & Documents
    • LGBTQ+ Support Groups and Documents
  • NIGRA
  • Archives
  • Contact

UK Research: Anti-LGBTQ+ Hate and Rising Trends

04/11/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Hate Crime Statistics die Anti-LGBTQ+ Hate and Rising Trends

The data on UK hate crimes presents a complex picture. Recent official statistics show a 2% decrease in sexual orientation-related hate crimes (from 19,127 to 18,702) and an 11% decrease in transgender identity-related crimes (from 4,258 to 3,809) in 2024/25. However, advocacy groups caution that these figures don’t tell the full story.

The statistics exclude Metropolitan Police data due to reporting changes, which significantly affect LGBTQ+ data, given that many LGBTQ+ people live in London. Additionally, over the past five years, hate crimes based on sexual orientation have risen by around 44% and those based on trans identity have nearly doubled at 88%.

LGBTQ+ hate crime charity Galop saw a 60% increase in LGBTQ+ hate crime victims coming to them for support in 2024, suggesting the official figures underestimate the true scale of the problem. Fewer than one in ten LGBTQ+ people report hate crimes or incidents to police, with half feeling the police wouldn’t do anything.

The Supreme Court Ruling

In April 2025, the UK Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the legal definition of woman under the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex assigned at birth. The case originated from a challenge by For Women Scotland to Scottish legislation requiring 50% of public board members to be women, which included transgender women with gender recognition certificates.

The ruling determined that interpreting ‘sex’ as certificated sex would cut across the definitions of ‘man’ and ‘woman’ in an incoherent way, and that transgender women could be excluded from same-sex facilities such as changing rooms if proportionate.

Many LGBTQ+ people are living in fear following the Supreme Court judgment, according to advocacy groups, though this period doesn’t fall within the most recent hate crime statistics. The ruling effectively forced trans people to use sex-segregated public services and facilities according to their sex-assigned at birth, contrary to their identity and appearance.

Reform UK’s Growing Influence

Reform UK’s manifesto pledges to ban “transgender ideology” in primary and secondary schools, with no gender questioning, social transitioning or pronoun swapping, and mandates single-sex facilities in schools. The party also states it will scrap the 2010 Equality Act and eliminate diversity, equality and inclusion roles.

69% of Reform UK voters believe that trans people should not be able to legally change their gender via a gender recognition certificate, though 65% still believe same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. The 10 English councils now controlled by Reform have banned the flying of Pride flags, limiting flagpoles to the Union Jack and regional emblems.

Reform UK’s electoral threat has pushed both Conservative and Labour parties to adopt more conservative positions on gender self-identification and transgender rights, framing these policies around safeguarding concerns for cisgender women and children.

Online Harassment and Platform Safety

GLAAD’s 2025 Social Media Safety Index found that platforms broadly under-moderated anti-LBGTQ+ hate content while over-moderating LGBTQ+ users, including taking down hashtags containing phrases such as queer, trans and non-binary. In the UK, coordinated far-right and Christian extremist online campaigns have targeted Pride events with fabricated claims that they are “sexualising public spaces,” with these narratives emboldening physical protests and attacks such as those witnessed at London Pride in 2024.

Two in five LGBTQ+ young people, including 58% of trans young people, have been targets of homophobic, biphobic or transphobic online abuse, while nearly all (97%) have witnessed it. Less than half of LGBTQ+ victims of online abuse reported their experiences to social media platforms, and less than one in ten reported to police.

School Bullying

A 2024 YouGov poll found that 47% of LGBTQ+ youth in the UK have been bullied or discriminated against at school or university because of their sexual orientation, and 25% faced bullying due to their gender identity. Half of those who experienced bullying never reported it, and of those who did report it to staff, more than seven in ten said staff responded badly.

Respondents reported being locked in toilets, kicked, verbally and sexually abused, with some being driven to suicidal thoughts, while others complained of teachers purposefully misgendering and mocking them in classrooms. 43% of LGBT+ school students have been bullied compared to 21% of non-LGBT+ students.

Conclusion

The research confirms the article’s themes for the UK context: rising anti-LBGTQ+ sentiment manifesting in hate crimes, discriminatory political developments like the Supreme Court ruling, the growing influence of anti-trans political parties like Reform UK, widespread online harassment, and persistent bullying in schools. While official hate crime statistics show recent decreases, the broader five-year trend shows significant increases, and underreporting remains a major issue.

Anti-LGBTQ+ Hate and Rising Trends

Links:

  • Anti-LGBTQ+ hate is rising in Western nations both on & offline
  • Homophobia and Terrorism are not limited to Muslims.

#LGBTQRights #TransRights #HateCrimes #UKPOLITICS #QueerRights #EndTransphobia #EndHomophobia #ProtectTransYouth #Equality #HumanRights #LGBTQSafety #UKNews #StandWithLGBTQ

 

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia, Community Journalist Tagged With: AI moderation, ally, anti-LGBT bills, anti-trans legislation, asexual, bathroom bills, biological sex, bisexual, British politics, bullying, censorship, child protection, civil rights, coming out, conversion therapy, culture wars, detransition, digital rights, discrimination, diversity, equality, Equality Act, erasure, far-right politics, feminist discourse, For Women Scotland, Galop, gay, gender critical, gender identity, gender ideology, gender nonconforming, gender recognition, gender recognition certificate, gender self-identification, gender-affirming care, GLAAD, grassroots activism, hate crime statistics, HATE CRIMES, hate speech, homophobia, hormone therapy, Human Rights, inclusion, Institute for Strategic Dialogue, Intersectionality, ISD, lesbian, LGBT, lgbt history, LGBTQ, LGBTQ advocacy, LGBTQ charities, LGBTQ culture, LGBTQ discrimination, LGBTQ education, LGBTQ families, LGBTQ mental health, LGBTQ news, LGBTQ organizations, LGBTQ policy, LGBTQ research, LGBTQ safety, LGBTQ violence, LGBTQ+ activism, LGBTQ+ support, LGBTQ+ visibility, LGBTQ+ youth, medical transition, moral panic, nonbinary, online harassment, pansexual, parental rights, platform safety, police response, political backlash, Pride, puberty blockers, queer community, queer news, queer rights, Reform UK, religious extremism, safeguarding, same sex marriage, school bullying, sex segregated spaces, sex-based rights, sexual orientation, social justice, social media harassment, sports bans, stonewall, Supreme Court, trans community, trans healthcare, trans news, trans rights, trans youth, transgender, transphobia, UK, UK legislation, underreporting, United Kingdom, women's rights, workplace discrimination

Gayfest 82

23/01/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

GAYFEST 82

Three NIGRA (from Sean McGouran’s recollection [Sean, Ho Mun Chien and Mark McKeronon]) persons went to the Gay Fest for a jaunt. 

 

Gayfest

PeaceGdnsSheffd

‘’’Our first impression of the People’s Republic of South Yorkshire was good – incredibly low bus fares.  The second was dire, Sheffield (appears) to have the dourest population imaginable.  The Gayfest was held in the Polytechnic, a teacher training college with delusions of grandeur, its architecture based on the labyrinth principle.  We had to walk to the opposite end of the campus to get to our billet, a very comfortable two-bedroom.  This is more than can be said for some of the other beds/rooms we slept in that weekend.

Apart from continually walking into closed meetings of CHE (the Campaign for Homosexual Equality) and into a wrangle between the SWPGG (Socialist Workers Party Gay Group) and a nice young man from the Spartacus League*.  (The SL and SWP are among the 57 varieties of Trot groupeens), the young ‘Spart’ compared their ‘line’ on Ireland with that of Iran.  The SWP gave undifferentiated support to the anti-Shah opposition, and look at what the Iranians got!  In Ireland, Master Spartacus said they supported anti-Gay and anti-women forces.  This led to the epochal event of a member of the SWP admitting that his Party was small and not about to seize power just yet.

The next meeting I attended was a duo between the Liberal Gay Action Group (LibGAG) and the Gay Social Democrats (GSD).  The Libs were very lordly and made rather injudiciously nostalgic remarks about the Lib-Lab pact pipe dream of the early ’70s (i. e. a governing alliance of Labour and the Liberals).  The GSD took it in good part and asked sharp questions, like will the Liberals’ portmanteau Bill of Rights be feasible?

Others attended the Gay Youth Movement (GYM)’s AGM, where a snide article about them in the Gay Gazette (the Festival’s journal) was attacked and the author ‘Pandora’ asked to apologise and also admit his / her name.  [It was Eric Presland / Peter Scott Presland – currently still playwriting and producing a history of CHE].  The youth groups GYM and the Joint Council for Gay Teenagers (JCGT) threaten to boycott next year’s Gay Fest. 

Three of us attended the SHRG (Scottish Homosexual Rights Group)’s seminar on S / M (sado-masochism).  It had a very good attendance neck and neck with the Labour Campaign for Gay Rights’ meeting which had the ‘bisexual’ MP for Bootle, Allan Roberts as guest speaker.  [One of us ought to have gone – but ‘sex’ proved more of an attraction  – upstart 2013]

The rest of Saturday was spent boozing and inflicting Gay Star on unsuspecting Brits.  Thus we missed the Workshop on Sexism and an explanation of what was the Gay Community Organisation [GCO – CHE split itself into a ‘political / campaigning side – CHE, and a ‘social’ side the GCO.  It was disastrous, GCO barely lasted out the year, and CHE was seriously weakened – upstart 2013].  We did get an ear-bashing about how wonderful Friday’s disco had been.  It sounded great until we were told the Gay’s are only allowed in once a month! 

We did see Eric Presland’s Teatrolley, or a Midsummer Night’s Scream, done by Consenting Adults in Public, in the open air.  Drink, damp grass, and an aversion to cod-Shakespeare, somewhat cloud one’s judgement, but generally the parade of Gay ‘types’ was interesting: the two Liberationists offering tea and ideological purity – the clones, the leathermen (played by an actor of great beauty and courage…  Anyone who would expose his bum to the inclemencies of an English Autumn, and an audience made up entirely of Gay women and men would have to be).  There was also a policeman who turns almost human.

The evening ended on a deliberately sour note when Consenting Adults… handed out leaflets recounting the horrors while befell the Kasir family and their small business.

On Sunday morning after carefully avoiding the Act of Worship, and not being lucky enough to avoid the truly dreadful breakfast, we nipped into the Gay Rights at Work meeting, where we learned that Judith Williams is getting fed up with a dreary round of meeting – and general unpleasantness.

We then went off to the worst-attended, but in many ways the most interesting meeting of the weekend.  The Revolutionary Gay Men’s Caucus organised Political Activity and Social Life, which was a pretty punchy attack on the Gay Liberation Movement.  According to their outlook the radicals, the lobbyists / civil-righters and the Gay proprietors were as one in seeing the oppression of Gays as a ‘technical matter of the distribution of resources’.  Meanwhile, whole categories of people are excluded from the Gay ‘scene’ – women, the disabled, the elderly, Black Gays, and to an extent, the unemployed.  The Gay Liberation Front had married revolutionary rhetoric to feeble reformist demands.  Thus they had to defend sexual pluralism under any guise, e. g., pornography, S / M – one of the RGMC defended pædophilia, presumably on the grounds that it wasn’t exploitative.

The arguments of the Caucus were rather like traversing a superbly engineered bridge, which one suddenly realises does not quite reach to opposite shore.  They offered no programme – ‘shopping lists of demands were useless without money or power’.  And some of the building materials of the bridge were questionable.  The ‘working class’ was referred to as if it were a solid entity.  Questioning brought the admission that it was difficult to define the working class, and that it is wracked with deep contradictions anyway; racism, sexism and so forth. 

Their attitude to ‘Ireland’ was, roughly: the Brits are in Ireland for imperialist reasons, therefore it was a brill idea to chuck ’em out.  The people who said this did admit that they were not entirely happy about the results for Gay people. 

An overall impression of the Festival: the price of set meals did tend to put a damper on socialising over meals, the restaurants and cafés on Eccleshall Road did a roaring trade.  The youth groups and ILIS (International Lesbian Information Service) met in separate venues from the (‘adult’) male, or anyway, male-oriented groups.  We only saw them striding purposely about from place to place.

The main corridor, from the bar to the gym-cum-disco area, was crowded with stalls hired by all sorts of Gay groups; revolutionaries, Tories (but no fascists – yet), humanists, Christians (but no Muslims or Hindus), weekend walkers, real ale freaks, pure-as-the-driven-snow bookshops, and bookshops selling porn.  There were bisexuals and leather people, but no (overt) pædophiles, young people, and a considerable number of decidedly elderly people.  People selling good papers, people selling bad papers, and people selling… um… Gay Star.

A Workshop deriving from Saturday’s seminar on S / M was very interesting and would have been more interesting if it had not been decided to split us into two groups.  In a small room, this caused both sessions to be incomprehensible.  People admitted to being nervous about some of the accoutrements of S / M sex and admitted that their fascination with the outer manifestations of dominance was distressing to them. Admittedly, some others did not find such things in the least distressing. 

Early in the session, someone launched a shrill and rather over-heated attack on S / M, suggesting that people into S / M are also into ‘terminal sex’.  The argument is self-evidently foolish.  Not everybody is a Mistress / Master, and anyway the economics of sex intervenes.  If you constantly bump people off, apart from the fact that it becomes rather noticeable even in the most closeted of scenes, you will find that people will no longer accept your invitations to light torture sessions.  Possibly this person was trying to say, in the manner of Freudian psychoanalysis, that S / M is something else.  Leather-sex people are ‘really’ repressed corpse-fuckers.

So far as we were concerned, the Festival ended roughly here.  We went off to the Stars disco later in the evening.  The organisers’ “five minute’s walk” proved to be wildly over-optimistic; it was more like half an hour.  The disco (run by Mecca, inventors of ‘Miss World’) was pretty drab.  It had a curious, limp, pre-liberation feel – there were lots of black’n’white pics of 1940s Hollywood ‘stars’.  There were lots of Muir caps with Anglo-Saxon potato faces under them.  The huge bar sold flat beer at inflated prices, and the dance floor was small. 

The only Gay elements were the Muir caps and the poppers.  The Gays are allowed into Stars once a fortnight.

Editorial report

 

* This was probably called the Spartacist League – a ‘Spartacus League’ was, or had been, the youth wing of the SWP (in its early IS / International Socialist guise).  This may not be entirely accurate – but the niceties of British Trotskyist history are very complex.  [upstart 2013].

This was the last Gay Fest – they had been run by CHE – presumably, there was some debate about whether or not it was a ‘political’ or a ‘social’ event.

Fortunately, CHE decided some years ago that the political and the social are no longer incompatible…

Gayfest

Unidentified young man at the CHE Conference 1975 (LSE HCA Archive)

Links:

  • Manchesterhive – Lesbian and Gay politics
  • LGBT Archive – Sheffield
  • University of Sheffield – Gay Pride, 1968 – 1979
  • LGBTQIA+ Heritage Symposium 2024

Filed Under: Editor to ACOMSDave, History Tagged With: 1970sGayRights, Activism, ArtInActivism, Bisexuality, CampaignForHomosexualEquality, CulturalCritique, CulturalFestival, GayActivism, GayCulture, GAYFEST82, GayLiberation, GaySocialDemocrats, HistoricalEvents, HomosexualRights, Intersectionality, LGBTQCommunity, LGBTQEvents, LGBTQIdentity, LGBTQYouth, PoliticalActivism, PublicDiscourse, QueerHistory, QueerPolitics, QueerStudies, QueerTheories, RevolutionaryCaucus, SadoMasochism, SexualPluralism, Sheffield, SheffieldPolytechnic, SocialJustice, Trotskyism

LGBTQIA+ Heritage Symposium 2024

12/10/2024 By ACOMSDave

AGENDA

Date: Saturday 12th October 2024
Venue: Canada Room, 1st Floor, Lanyon Building, Queen’s University Belfast
Time: 10am – 1pm

Opening Remarks

Adam Murray – Lead Organiser
Dr. Matt Leebody – Chair of Cara-Friend
Dr. Tom Hulme – Reader, School of History, Anthropology, Philosophy & Politics at Queen’s University
Panel 1 – Where Is Our LGBTQIA+ Heritage? 10.10am
Panellist 1 – Dr. Karen Logan (Ulster Museum)
Panellist 2 – Lorraine Bourke (Public Records Office NI)
Panellist 3 – Samantha McCombe (Linenhall Library)
Panellist 4 – Sinéad Bhreathnach-Cashell (NI Screen’s Digital Film Archive)

Comfort Break

Panel 2 – The Value of LGBTQIA+ Heritage 11.00am
Panellist 1 – Dominic Montague (Kabosh Theatre Company)
Panellist 2 – Dr. Richard O’Leary (Performance Storyteller)
Panellist 3 – JT Politzer (Graduate Student, Kent State Uni.)
Panellist 4 – Cathal McGuigan (LGBTQIA+ Heritage Project Volunteer)

Feature – UTV Archive clips

Panel 3 – Looking To The Future 11.55am
Panellist 1 – Adam Murray (Cara-Friend)
Panellist 2 – Mary Ellen Campbell (LGBTQIA+ Heritage Project)
Panellist 3 – Dr. Tom Hulme (Queer NI Project)
Panellist 4 – Dr. Molly Merryman (Kent State University)

Closing Remarks

This symposium is the opening event of the Founding Cara-Friend: Preserving At Risk LGBTQIA+
Heritage Project made possible thanks to generous funding by The National Lottery Heritage Fund.
Cara-Friend wishes to thank the NLHF and the lottery players who make this possible.

Tagged With: Activism and Advocacy, Archiving LGBTQIA+ Stories, Celebrating Diversity, Community Engagement, Conference 2024, Cultural Preservation, Diversity and Inclusion, Education and Awareness, Heritage Symposium, Historical Impact, Intersectionality, LGBTQ+ History, LGBTQIA+ Heritage, LGBTQIA+ Rights, Networking Opportunities, Oral Histories, Pride and Identity, Queer Studies, Representation, social justice

Categories

Copyright ACOMSDave.com © 2025