ACOMSDave

Community Journalist

The Lavender Scare Revisited

By Leave a Comment

Lavender Scare

 

 

The Lavender Scare serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers of state-sanctioned discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals and the profound impact it can have on lives and civil rights. While the UK has made notable progress since the deeply ingrained stigma of the mid-20th century, ongoing advocacy and awareness remain vital to achieving true equality and acceptance. Understanding this historical context is essential for recognising how far we’ve come and the work still ahead to fully support LGBTQI+ rights and inclusion.

The “Lavender Scare” describes a dark chapter in mid-20th-century history, mainly from the late 1940s through the 1960s, when gay men and lesbians working in the US federal government faced widespread dismissal and forced resignation because of their sexuality. This period of repression was closely linked to anti-communist fears and congressional investigations, which falsely painted LGBTQ+ individuals as security threats and potential communist sympathisers.

 

 

 

Key lessons from the Lavender Scare include:

  • Perception of vulnerability:   Homosexuality was heavily stigmatised, with the false belief that LGBTQ+ individuals were susceptible to blackmail, risking national security.
  • Anti-communist parallels:   This era coincided with the Red Scare and McCarthyism, where suspicion of communist ties led to widespread suspicion and persecution.
  • Dismissals and forced resignations:   Many federal employees were fired or compelled to leave their jobs solely based on their sexual orientation.
  • Absence of legal protections:   There were no laws safeguarding against discrimination based on sexual orientation during this time.
  • Social isolation and stigma:   Many affected individuals faced profound social rejection and lived in fear and silence.
  • Impact on civil rights:   The Lavender Scare fueled the broader fight for LGBTQ+ civil rights, highlighting the need for equality.
  • Legal progress:   Over time, legal battles and court rulings began to challenge and curb federal discrimination, laying the groundwork for future protections.

Reflecting on this history underscores both the resilience of the LGBTQI+ community and the ongoing necessity of activism and awareness to protect and advance their rights today.

 

Links:

 

The Saint – Nothing New

By Leave a Comment

The SaintThis week, I picked up a copy of “The Saint Plays with Fire“, published originally in 1958.

To many, the Saint is either a radio series, a TV series featuring Roger Moore or Ian Ogilvy, or a film starring actors such as Val Kilmer.  However, the full flavour can only be understood by reading the original books.  There will be elements which are no longer acceptable in terms of comments and observations by the Saint, his friends and the ‘baddies’.  There is not a small degree of nostalgia for the somewhat gentile era that has long left us, but there is nothing wrong with dreams and nostalgia.

However, the reason I have put pen to paper about this book is because of this extract from the book:

“… to crush them like vermin, to destroy them like rats who would carry their plague germs through our fair land!  The blood of a million Frenchmen, dead on the fields of glory, cries out to you to show yourselves worthy of their sacrifice.  Rise up and arm yourselves against this peril that threatens you from within; stamp out these cowardly pacifists, these skulking traitors, these godless anarchists, these alien Jews who are betraying out country for a handful of gold … Sons of France, I call you to arms.   Fling yourselves into the fight with a song on your lips and glory in your hearts, for only in the blood and fire of battle will our nation be purified and find once ore her true soul!”

 

I write to warn you about the same thing that Leslie Charteris wrote about in 1958; the Far Right Parties that have reconstituted in Europe, these are not listed in any particular relevance, just a list:

1.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_People%27s_Party_of_Estonia
2.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vox_(Spanish_political_party)
3.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidesz
4.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Homeland_Movement
5.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden_Democrats
6.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lega_Nord
7.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brothers_of_Italy
8.        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartans_(Greek_political_party)

 

But, we are haemorrhaging under these ‘far right’ parties who are destroying our culture under the guise of protecting our future; the slow creeping of these parties taking a position in government, brain washing a proportion of the populace about the damage that minority groups are causing to their way of live in terms of wages, housing, safety is so reminiscent of a period in history that we have only just celebrated the end of with VE day.

History must not be allowed to repeat itself, either here in the UK, or in Europe; or in the USA which seems to have even its constitution under threat.

 

In the light of these pressures, I can and do encourage everyone who can vote to vote when given the opportunity to vote, don’t let our way of life be taken away because you have been disillusioned with politics or politicians! 

Links:

Truth Recovery Process (TRP) – by Jeffrey Dudgeon MBE

By Leave a Comment

To Padraig Yeates
 
Truth Recovery Process (TRP)
 
Truth Recovery Process (TRP) - Kincora Boys' HomeI must respond to a series of newspaper articles reproduced in TRP based on the reissued Chris Moore book about the Kincora boys’ home, which are stated to be ‘deeply damaging’ to unionism.
 
The so-called revelations are in fact few and noticeable for lack of verification. The allegations of criminal misbehaviour attributed to Lord Mountbatten have been countered on many occasions, not least by members of his staff at Classiebawn Castle in Mullaghmore.
 
The new stories are, for the most part, hard to credit and essentially require one to believe in a conspiracy between the RUC and in turn, the Guards to turn a blind eye to the trafficking of boys across the border from Belfast to Sligo. One, Richard Kerr, is quoted as explaining that he and a friend “were driven by Kincora warden Joe Mains to the car park of the Manor House Country Hotel outside Enniskillen in August 1977. Two of Mountbatten’s security men then allegedly arrived in separate black Ford Cortinas to ferry the boys to Mullaghmore, 45 miles away. The teenagers were dropped off separately at Classiebawn Castle “before being taken individually from a guest reception room to the green boathouse where they were sexually assaulted and then returned to the Manor House.”
 
I understand there is no boathouse at the castle, while the Guards would not have crossed the border. Mountbatten would only have had RUC protection if he travelled into the north which he apparently rarely did. I imagine if he had asked the RUC for security advice they would have said do not go to the Republic, least of all to holiday there.
The problem with Richard Kerr is that he was long associated with Carl Beech and his fantasies about Ted Heath and other prominent political figures. Beech was jailed for 18 years in 2019 for perverting the course of justice and fraud.
The other new story, new to me anyway, is that an RUC detective “contacted by concerned social workers, secretly photographed VIPs visiting Kincora including NIO officials, lay magistrates, police officers and businessmen.” However no names of these recognisable visitors or indeed photographs have been produced. Why not?
The long Sunday Life extract from the book on Chris Moore’s meeting with William McGrath is remarkable for the absence of any substance. McGrath was a practised deceiver and determined homosexual who even misbehaved with a family member. Regardless of his later denials, he pleaded guilty in 1982 to a series of charges relating to boys at Kincora, as did two other staff who were less vicious. 
 
It is important to note that boys’ homes in Northern Ireland were cleaned up decades before those in England or the Republic. 
That the brother of Brian McDermott, the boy murdered and dismembered in Belfast in 1973, allegedly confessed to the crime was, of course, not mentioned when another name, that of a minor unionist figure, is suggested as the culprit with no back-up evidence.
Kincora was heavily investigated by Sir Anthony Hart’s public inquiry (the last of a series) which reported in 2017. It had a whole module devoted to the home whose many chapters are available on the internet.
 
The evidence around a VIP vice ring out of Kincora was forensically examined. Hart’s inquiry concluded they did not find “any credible evidence to show that there is any basis for the allegations that have been made over the years about the involvement of others in sexual abuse of residents in Kincora, or anything to show that the security agencies were complicit in any form of exploitation of sexual abuse in Kincora for any purpose.”
Kerr along with the three other main conspiracy theorists declined to give evidence at the inquiry and are fairly robustly treated in the report, with their various, often conflicting, statements on Kincora taken apart. 
 
On William McGrath, the report stated, “Based on our extensive examination of a very large number of files held by RUC Special Branch, by MI5, by SIS and by the Ministry of Defence, we are satisfied that McGrath was never an agent of the State, although he may have enjoyed creating an air of mystery about his activities, part of which may well have involved him hinting at, or implying in an oblique fashion, that he was an agent of the State.”
 
Journalists who, on the one hand, call for judicial public inquiries in legacy matters and then discount or ignore the findings, as with Hart, lose their credibility and can be seen instead as simply pushing a nationalist line to feed tabloid conspiracy theories.
 
Jeff Dudgeon
19 May 2025
 
Link:

Belfast Listed Buildings

By Leave a Comment

Belfast Listed Buildings

On Saturday, February 22, 2025, the Belfast Telegraph (Sam McQuade) published a compelling piece titled “Belfast is a great city, but swathes of it are crumbling…”, in this he is referring to our listed buildings in the main, but by inference to the general state of Belfast.

The article boiled down to two main ideas:

1. Belfast’s crumbling buildings and neglected areas
2. Why do the authorities seem powerless to halt the decay?

Like many cities, Belfast has always been a hub of change, shaped by shifts in population, employment, and development. Yes, our history is marked by the Troubles, which devastated both people and infrastructure. But Belfast has shown resilience, bouncing back with new developments like Castle Court, the Victoria Centre, and the Waterfront. Still, vast parts of the city remain overlooked, opportunities lost.

Take, for example, the area between the Short Strand and the Lagan, or the Tribecca site between Donegall Street, Rosemary Street, and Royal Avenue. I’m not here to rewrite the article, but what struck me most was the missed opportunities—funding sitting idle in bank accounts for years, generating interest, while nothing materialises on the ground.

The planning department seems to lack a clear, coherent strategy to preserve what heritage remains. Meanwhile, politicians at Stormont appear to play at politics, failing repeatedly to safeguard Belfast’s history, its fabric, and its future.

Then there’s the case of the Victorian houses in the University area, recommended for listed status as of March 15, 2025. They’re interesting, no doubt, but what really caught my attention was the broader context: Northern Ireland currently has 9,000 listed buildings, yet this is only the second survey since 1974—that’s 51 years between checks. That’s simply too long.

Some experts understand the intricacies of our listed building process better than I do, but even I can see that without a cohesive, forward-thinking plan—beyond mere politics—the gaps in protecting our city’s heritage are glaring.

Belfast Listed BuildingsBelfast Listed Buildings Belfast Listed Buildings Belfast Listed Buildings

 

 

Links:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gayfest 82

By Leave a Comment

GAYFEST 82

Three NIGRA (from Sean McGouran’s recollection [Sean, Ho Mun Chien and Mark McKeronon]) persons went to the Gay Fest for a jaunt. 

 

Gayfest

PeaceGdnsSheffd

‘’’Our first impression of the People’s Republic of South Yorkshire was good – incredibly low bus fares.  The second was dire, Sheffield (appears) to have the dourest population imaginable.  The Gayfest was held in the Polytechnic, a teacher training college with delusions of grandeur, its architecture based on the labyrinth principle.  We had to walk to the opposite end of the campus to get to our billet, a very comfortable two-bedroom.  This is more than can be said for some of the other beds/rooms we slept in that weekend.

Apart from continually walking into closed meetings of CHE (the Campaign for Homosexual Equality) and into a wrangle between the SWPGG (Socialist Workers Party Gay Group) and a nice young man from the Spartacus League*.  (The SL and SWP are among the 57 varieties of Trot groupeens), the young ‘Spart’ compared their ‘line’ on Ireland with that of Iran.  The SWP gave undifferentiated support to the anti-Shah opposition, and look at what the Iranians got!  In Ireland, Master Spartacus said they supported anti-Gay and anti-women forces.  This led to the epochal event of a member of the SWP admitting that his Party was small and not about to seize power just yet.

The next meeting I attended was a duo between the Liberal Gay Action Group (LibGAG) and the Gay Social Democrats (GSD).  The Libs were very lordly and made rather injudiciously nostalgic remarks about the Lib-Lab pact pipe dream of the early ’70s (i. e. a governing alliance of Labour and the Liberals).  The GSD took it in good part and asked sharp questions, like will the Liberals’ portmanteau Bill of Rights be feasible?

Others attended the Gay Youth Movement (GYM)’s AGM, where a snide article about them in the Gay Gazette (the Festival’s journal) was attacked and the author ‘Pandora’ asked to apologise and also admit his / her name.  [It was Eric Presland / Peter Scott Presland – currently still playwriting and producing a history of CHE].  The youth groups GYM and the Joint Council for Gay Teenagers (JCGT) threaten to boycott next year’s Gay Fest. 

Three of us attended the SHRG (Scottish Homosexual Rights Group)’s seminar on S / M (sado-masochism).  It had a very good attendance neck and neck with the Labour Campaign for Gay Rights’ meeting which had the ‘bisexual’ MP for Bootle, Allan Roberts as guest speaker.  [One of us ought to have gone – but ‘sex’ proved more of an attraction  – upstart 2013]

The rest of Saturday was spent boozing and inflicting Gay Star on unsuspecting Brits.  Thus we missed the Workshop on Sexism and an explanation of what was the Gay Community Organisation [GCO – CHE split itself into a ‘political / campaigning side – CHE, and a ‘social’ side the GCO.  It was disastrous, GCO barely lasted out the year, and CHE was seriously weakened – upstart 2013].  We did get an ear-bashing about how wonderful Friday’s disco had been.  It sounded great until we were told the Gay’s are only allowed in once a month! 

We did see Eric Presland’s Teatrolley, or a Midsummer Night’s Scream, done by Consenting Adults in Public, in the open air.  Drink, damp grass, and an aversion to cod-Shakespeare, somewhat cloud one’s judgement, but generally the parade of Gay ‘types’ was interesting: the two Liberationists offering tea and ideological purity – the clones, the leathermen (played by an actor of great beauty and courage…  Anyone who would expose his bum to the inclemencies of an English Autumn, and an audience made up entirely of Gay women and men would have to be).  There was also a policeman who turns almost human.

The evening ended on a deliberately sour note when Consenting Adults… handed out leaflets recounting the horrors while befell the Kasir family and their small business.

On Sunday morning after carefully avoiding the Act of Worship, and not being lucky enough to avoid the truly dreadful breakfast, we nipped into the Gay Rights at Work meeting, where we learned that Judith Williams is getting fed up with a dreary round of meeting – and general unpleasantness.

We then went off to the worst-attended, but in many ways the most interesting meeting of the weekend.  The Revolutionary Gay Men’s Caucus organised Political Activity and Social Life, which was a pretty punchy attack on the Gay Liberation Movement.  According to their outlook the radicals, the lobbyists / civil-righters and the Gay proprietors were as one in seeing the oppression of Gays as a ‘technical matter of the distribution of resources’.  Meanwhile, whole categories of people are excluded from the Gay ‘scene’ – women, the disabled, the elderly, Black Gays, and to an extent, the unemployed.  The Gay Liberation Front had married revolutionary rhetoric to feeble reformist demands.  Thus they had to defend sexual pluralism under any guise, e. g., pornography, S / M – one of the RGMC defended pædophilia, presumably on the grounds that it wasn’t exploitative.

The arguments of the Caucus were rather like traversing a superbly engineered bridge, which one suddenly realises does not quite reach to opposite shore.  They offered no programme – ‘shopping lists of demands were useless without money or power’.  And some of the building materials of the bridge were questionable.  The ‘working class’ was referred to as if it were a solid entity.  Questioning brought the admission that it was difficult to define the working class, and that it is wracked with deep contradictions anyway; racism, sexism and so forth. 

Their attitude to ‘Ireland’ was, roughly: the Brits are in Ireland for imperialist reasons, therefore it was a brill idea to chuck ’em out.  The people who said this did admit that they were not entirely happy about the results for Gay people. 

An overall impression of the Festival: the price of set meals did tend to put a damper on socialising over meals, the restaurants and cafés on Eccleshall Road did a roaring trade.  The youth groups and ILIS (International Lesbian Information Service) met in separate venues from the (‘adult’) male, or anyway, male-oriented groups.  We only saw them striding purposely about from place to place.

The main corridor, from the bar to the gym-cum-disco area, was crowded with stalls hired by all sorts of Gay groups; revolutionaries, Tories (but no fascists – yet), humanists, Christians (but no Muslims or Hindus), weekend walkers, real ale freaks, pure-as-the-driven-snow bookshops, and bookshops selling porn.  There were bisexuals and leather people, but no (overt) pædophiles, young people, and a considerable number of decidedly elderly people.  People selling good papers, people selling bad papers, and people selling… um… Gay Star.

A Workshop deriving from Saturday’s seminar on S / M was very interesting and would have been more interesting if it had not been decided to split us into two groups.  In a small room, this caused both sessions to be incomprehensible.  People admitted to being nervous about some of the accoutrements of S / M sex and admitted that their fascination with the outer manifestations of dominance was distressing to them. Admittedly, some others did not find such things in the least distressing. 

Early in the session, someone launched a shrill and rather over-heated attack on S / M, suggesting that people into S / M are also into ‘terminal sex’.  The argument is self-evidently foolish.  Not everybody is a Mistress / Master, and anyway the economics of sex intervenes.  If you constantly bump people off, apart from the fact that it becomes rather noticeable even in the most closeted of scenes, you will find that people will no longer accept your invitations to light torture sessions.  Possibly this person was trying to say, in the manner of Freudian psychoanalysis, that S / M is something else.  Leather-sex people are ‘really’ repressed corpse-fuckers.

So far as we were concerned, the Festival ended roughly here.  We went off to the Stars disco later in the evening.  The organisers’ “five minute’s walk” proved to be wildly over-optimistic; it was more like half an hour.  The disco (run by Mecca, inventors of ‘Miss World’) was pretty drab.  It had a curious, limp, pre-liberation feel – there were lots of black’n’white pics of 1940s Hollywood ‘stars’.  There were lots of Muir caps with Anglo-Saxon potato faces under them.  The huge bar sold flat beer at inflated prices, and the dance floor was small. 

The only Gay elements were the Muir caps and the poppers.  The Gays are allowed into Stars once a fortnight.

Editorial report

 

* This was probably called the Spartacist League – a ‘Spartacus League’ was, or had been, the youth wing of the SWP (in its early IS / International Socialist guise).  This may not be entirely accurate – but the niceties of British Trotskyist history are very complex.  [upstart 2013].

This was the last Gay Fest – they had been run by CHE – presumably, there was some debate about whether or not it was a ‘political’ or a ‘social’ event.

Fortunately, CHE decided some years ago that the political and the social are no longer incompatible…

Gayfest

Unidentified young man at the CHE Conference 1975 (LSE HCA Archive)

Links:

Reform The House of Lords?

By Leave a Comment

Reform the House of LordsI discussed how we might reform the House of Lords, even the House of Commons with Sean McGouran last weekend.  The surprising thing was that I was the one coming up with radical ideas!

I decided to do some further reading and the following ideas isolated themselves:

 

Here’s a summary of ideas for revamping the House of Lords:

1. Reforming Membership

  • Abolition of Life Peers: Replace life peerages with term-limited appointments to ensure turnover.
  • Reducing Membership: Limit the number of members to make the chamber more manageable and efficient.
  • Regional Representation: Appoint or elect members to represent regions or nations of the UK, improving local representation.
  • Removal of Hereditary Peers: Eliminate the remaining hereditary peers to modernize the chamber.
  • Merit-Based Appointments: Introduce a system where members are selected based on professional or academic achievements.

2. Electoral Reforms

  • Fully Elected Chamber: Transform the Lords into a wholly elected body to enhance democratic accountability.
  • Partially Elected/Hybrid Model: Combine elected members with appointed experts to retain diverse expertise.
  • Proportional Representation: Use proportional representation for elections to better reflect public opinion.

3. Functional and Structural Changes

  • Advisory Role Only: Restrict the Lords to a purely advisory function, with no legislative blocking powers.
  • Enhanced Scrutiny: Focus on improving legislative scrutiny, especially for complex policies.
  • Term Limits: Impose term limits on all members to prevent lifetime positions.

4. Transparency and Accountability

  • Code of Conduct: Strengthen ethics rules and enforce stricter accountability for members.
  • Public Involvement: Create mechanisms for citizens to nominate or select members for appointment.

5. Complete Replacement

  • Senate Model: Replace the Lords with a second chamber modelled after senates in other countries, such as the U.S. or Australia.
  • Citizen Assembly: Replace the Lords with a randomly selected citizen assembly to ensure diverse representation.

6. Abolition

  • Unicameral System: Abolish the House of Lords entirely, leaving the House of Commons as the sole legislative body.

7. Devolutionary Considerations

  • Federal Chamber: Recast the Lords as a federal body representing the UK’s devolved nations and regions.
  • National Assemblies Input: Allow devolved governments a role in selecting or appointing members.

8. Cultural and Symbolic Changes

  • Rebranding: Rename the chamber to reflect modern values (e.g., “Senate” or “Council of the Nations”).
  • Relocation: Move the chamber outside London to symbolize decentralization and inclusivity.

Each proposal has its advantages and challenges, often balancing tradition, expertise, democratic legitimacy, and efficiency.’

 

During Sean’s and my discussion, I suggested the reform of The House of Lords could encompass:

  • remove the clergy from the House
  • No one should be made a peer unless they have achieved something of note in society (e.g. a Senior Trade Unionist who has worked his/her way through the ranks, not just an economics/politics degree)

there were other ideas, but the list above is probably more comprehensive.

I do honestly believe that the House of Lords should stay as a bugger to the House of Commmons – which now seems to be filled with ‘career’ politicians in the main, who seem to be more interested in their career than the country; there have been to many scandals, with too many public enquiries which take too long to reach a verdict (if they even do) – and often when the enquiry is finished it has little or no impact.

 

[What are the tricks used by the government that most people don’t know?

 

Private Inquiries – used as a convenient method to kick any awkward questions for government into the VERY long grass.

  • Public Inquiries – to appoint a chair to oversee such a body – with the nudge that they will receive a preferment of knighthood/damehood or be elevated to the upper house if they come out in favour of the fraudulent government requirement – usually through corruption or incompetence or both, and to probably keep the inquiry going for so long, that people responsible for such a travesty conveniently forget, while the press and the public lose interest.
  • Variations on the above – to exculpate any notion of impropriety from the government or their political party, or indeed anyone or anything remotely associated with them.

Leaks: probably originally emanating from the top No 10.

These are particularly useful when a member of the government makes a total ‘balls-up’ of something, A contrary public relations propaganda campaign is quickly utilized, to fabricate and provide an illusion that everything was carried out by the government/cabinet member in the strictest form according to the very highest principles, and the media – or most of them – accede to the deception and manipulation, or else they face consequences!

Whisper Campaigns

Rumours, innuendo, and slanderous statements are quietly conveyed in order to damage reputations and/or dry up funding sources and support. Because the allegations are not made publicly, the target is caught in a Catch-22: if the candidate publicly denounces the rumours, it calls attention to the issue. If the candidate ignores the behind-the-back rumours, the campaign can be damaged.

Push Polling

Push polling is an unfair and unethical political device used to communicate negative messages. Under the guise of conducting a legitimate poll, defamatory or otherwise negative and usually false information is conveyed.

Unfair Competition

Practices that hamper the opponent’s ability to fairly compete are unethical. You will sometimes see wealthy candidates hiring as many political consultants as are available, not for their services, but to keep them from working for the opponent. If a candidate condones the removal of posters or any behaviour that stifles the opponent’s message, he or she is engaging in unethical campaigning.

Interference with the Electoral Process

Any campaign practice that provides an obstacle to a citizen’s ability to vote interferes with our democratic notions of fair and free elections. Destruction of mail-in ballots, deliberately staged traffic jams on Election Day, and voter intimidation at the polls are all examples of unethical – and in many instances illegal — tactics designed to discourage voting.

The October Surprise

The infamous “October surprise” is the generic term for a negative attack that comes out shortly before an election, giving the target of the attack little or no time to respond. If the attack is subject to denial or rational explanation, the interests of an informed electorate – if indeed there is such an entity – require that assertions be timed in such a way as to allow a response.]

 

Links:

 

 

 

 

 

Rogue Element in British Politics

By Leave a Comment

Rogue Element in British PoliticsA week into the new year, British politics has been dominated by Elon Musk, and outside ‘Rogue Element’. The focus has shifted to the grooming gangs scandal, which continues to make headlines, with victims failed by police, social services, and politicians for decades. Musk’s intervention in this long-standing issue has finally prompted action. The government is now considering the key recommendations from Professor Alexis Jay’s 2022 report on child sexual abuse, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announcing plans for implementation.

Musk, though not a British citizen, has become an influential figure in UK politics, particularly through his feud with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and his support for far-right figures like Tommy Robinson. His recent remarks have added fuel to the fire, even as he seeks to undermine British democracy by questioning the legitimacy of the UK electoral system. This has forced Labour and the Conservatives to react, with both sides grappling with Musk’s influence.

The Tories are carefully navigating the situation, capitalizing on the grooming scandal to target Labour, but they too are vulnerable. Musk’s rhetoric, including promoting a petition for a new election, has sparked discontent with the political system. Nigel Farage (an internal Rogue Element), aware of the potential damage Musk’s involvement could cause, warns that it could further erode trust in Westminster. As the situation unfolds, both major parties find themselves under pressure, with Musk’s influence serving as a disruptive force in British politics.

 

Links:

 

“The Woodfolk” : Movie Review

By Leave a Comment

The Woodfolk“The Woodfolk,” directed by the talented duo Joey and Luke Culver, is an enchanting exploration of self-discovery wrapped in the charm of rural life. This romantic drama, produced by Benjy Alfreds, offers an engaging narrative that intertwines the whimsical with the profound, as it follows the journey of a young field worker, portrayed captivatingly by Bruno Kalo, in search of deeper meaning amidst the simplicity of his daily routine.

The film opens with sweeping panoramic shots of the countryside, captured beautifully by director of photography Sudiardi Sudyono. The visuals create an immersive atmosphere, transporting the audience into the lush, serene landscapes where the protagonist, a romantic young boy, spends his days. The cinematography enhances the emotional depth of the narrative, providing a visual metaphor for the character’s internal struggles and aspirations.

At its core, “The Woodfolk” tells the story of a field worker whose aspirations reach beyond the limitations of his daily labor. Bruno Kalo delivers a wonderful performance, portraying the character’s naivety and yearning with sincerity. His interactions with the natural environment serve as a poignant reflection of his quest for meaning. The film skillfully juxtaposes his mundane work hours with his introspective moments, evoking a sense of nostalgia and longing.

Maria Laura Gentile shines in the role of the love interest, infusing the film with warmth and chemistry. Their relationship unfolds against the backdrop of fields and woodlands, symbolizing the beauty and complexity of love in its simplest form. The narrative masterfully balances romantic tension and existential inquiry, inviting viewers to contemplate their own lives while invested in the characters’ journey.

The original score by The Swingin’ Hermlins enhances the film’s emotive moments, weaving a melodic thread that complements both the joyful and contemplative scenes. The music feels organic, embodying the spirit of the countryside and evoking memories of simpler times. It serves as both a narrative tool and a character in its own right, underlining the emotional peaks and valleys of the story.

The film’s production team, including sound designer Marcus Hudson and costume designer Cas Massey, contribute to the authenticity and richness of the narrative. From the soundscapes that capture the whispers of the wind and the songs of birds to the thoughtfully designed costumes that reflect the characters’ personalities and milieu, every detail adds depth to the story.

Editing by Nina Caprice and Luke Culver maintains a steady pace, allowing the audience to absorb the film’s lyrical quality while keeping the narrative moving forward. The seamless transitions between scenes—shaped with care—reflect both the passage of time and the protagonist’s evolving understanding of himself and his desires.

One of the most remarkable aspects of “The Woodfolk” is how it tackles themes of existentialism within a romantic framework. It poses questions about identity, purpose, and the connection to nature, encouraging viewers to reflect on their own paths and the meaning they find in their everyday lives. It’s this philosophical undercurrent that elevates the film from a simple romance to a thoughtful meditation on life and love.

Overall, “The Woodfolk” is a beautifully crafted film that invites its audience to slow down and savor the moments that define us. The Culver brothers, alongside their dedicated crew, have created a heartfelt narrative that resonates long after the credits roll. With rich performances, stunning visuals, and an evocative score, this film is a delightful reminder of the beauty found in both love and self-discovery. If you’re in the mood for a reflective and charming cinematic experience, “The Woodfolk” is undoubtedly worth watching.

The Woodfolk is not a gay movie, but Bruno Kalo is very pleasing to the eye.

 

Directed by Joey & Luke Culver Producer Benjy Alfreds

Written by Joey Culver 1st Ad Daniel Riccio

Post- producer Emma Cano Grant

Original Music by The Swingin’ Hermlins

Starring:

Bruno Kalo

Maria Laura GentileKit Smith

 

Links:

 

1983 – Gay Conference Comes To Belfast

By Leave a Comment

 
 

Gay Conference Comes To Belfast1983 – Gay Conference Comes To Belfast, what a headline.  When you consider that the Good Friday Agreement was 5 years away.  The ‘troubles’ were still happening all around us, and we were also 8 years away from our first Pride March in Belfast, the fact that a gay conference was held is nothing short of remarkable.  This is the small article that was published in Northern Ireland’s only gay publication, which can be found in the Linen Hall Libary Political Collection on the fourth floor.

 

…This is a short report on the All Ireland Lesbian and Gay Men’s Conference which was held in 1983 in Belfast, at the Crescent Arts Centre and the Gay Centre.  As many as 200 lesbians and gay men were expected at this 3rd annual conference.

The first conference was in Cork in 1981, and in 1982 was in Dublin.  The two of them were organised by ‘independent’ lesbians and gay men and supported by national organisations that provided facilities.  It was significant that only a handful of delegates from Northern Ireland were present at both conferences.

In January 1983 a planning meeting was in Belfast for the 1983 conference which was attended by many of the former committee members from 1981 and 1982.  Belfast representation was limited to half a dozen men – all members of NIGRa (Northern Ireland Gay Rights Association).

The Dublin Conference had been uniquely successful in having equal numbers of women and men attending.  The absence of women from this planning conference augured poorly for the future of a Belfast conference.

The afternoon session was better attended by Belfast/Derry people and a meeting was planned for a fortnight later to bring together ‘non-organisation’ lesbians and gay men in the region.  Six women and six men attended, including Charles Kerrigan of the Dublin Gay Collective.

It was decided in principle, that those non-organisational people would determine the nature and organisation of the conference.

NIGRA’s role was to provide facilities, admin and any other help…

 

We talk about our history, but we have done little to mark it, to record it and remember it.  If you wish to have your history recorded, don’t forget the LGBTQIA+ Heritage Project (link below).

 

Links:

 

 

 

Why the LGBTQ+ Community Should Be Cautious of Data Collection

By Leave a Comment

 

Why the LGBTQ+ Community Should Be Cautious of Data CollectionThe LGBTQ+ community has a historical reason for being cautious of data collection. Here are some key factors:

  1. Historical Discrimination: Throughout history, data has been used to target and discriminate against marginalized groups. This includes the persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals in various societies.
  2. Privacy Concerns: Data collection can pose significant privacy risks. Misuse of personal information can lead to discrimination, harassment, or even violence.
  3. Lack of Trust: Given historical and ongoing discrimination, many LGBTQ+ individuals may have difficulty trusting institutions or individuals collecting their data.
  4. Potential for Misuse: Data can be used to reinforce stereotypes, justify discrimination, or even inform harmful policies.
  5. Limited Control: Once data is collected, individuals may have limited control over how it is used or shared.

It’s important to note that not all data collection is harmful. When done ethically and transparently, data can be used to advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, improve services, and promote understanding. However, it’s crucial for individuals to be aware of the potential risks and to exercise caution when sharing personal information.

 

“Empower yourself and the LGBTQ+ community by staying informed about data privacy.

Share this article to raise awareness and advocate for safe data practices!”

 

 

 

Links: