ACOMSDave

Community Journalist

  • Home
  • Community Journalist
  • Events
  • Media Page and Press Kit
    • Projects and Work
  • Resources & Documents
    • LGBTQ+ Support Groups and Documents
  • NIGRA
  • Archives
  • Contact

Archives for August 2015

Dear Straight Men, Come Out Already

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Mason Hsieh Become a fan
Activist, dancer, journalist, and screenwriter – Posted: 07/30/2015 11:39 am EDT
Locker Room Jocks
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Apparently, they called it a “bro-job,” which referred to the oral sex the male rowers occasionally engaged in with one another in the showers back in high school. Or at least that’s what my friend told me. Neither he nor any of the other guys on the team identified as gay, but according to his reports, they would often hook up post-practice, but “like bros, you know? Not in a gay way.”
Every time we talked about it, we always stalemated on the same issues. How can a guy hook up with another and still be straight? Isn’t the act of hooking up with and sexually desiring someone of the same sex inherently gay?
Not Gay - Sex Between Straight White MenJane Ward may attempt to shed some light on this in her up and coming book, Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men. Crotch-deep in the world of “straight guy-on-guy action,” Not Gay explores the ways in which straight men engage in sexual activity with other straight men. According to the NYU Press release, “Ward illustrates that sex between straight white men allows them to leverage whiteness and masculinity to authenticate their heterosexuality in the context of sex with men.”
But controlling for race, can engaging in homosexual sex really reaffirm a man’s heterosexuality? Can being with another man make him more straight? Or is it more like the “one-drop rule” — one homosexual interaction and you are forever labeled gay? All of this begs and points to the million-dollar question: Is it the act or the person that makes someone gay or straight? And to this, I look to the split between “identity” and “preference.”
I believe that there is a distinct difference between “gay” and “homosexual.” By definition, homo- and heterosexuality refer specifically to a person’s sexual attraction or preference. In other words, it merely relates to whether the individual prefers or is attracted to partners of the same or opposite sex. Meanwhile, “gay” and “straight” are identities or social categories, which can only fully be assigned to an individual when self-proclaimed, either via declaration or coercion. Thus, I believe that a person is not truly gay until “out,” or in the worst-case scenario, “out-ed.”
Following this logic, I think that an out gay man can have sex with a woman and still be seen as rightfully gay. While the preference and act may be heterosexual, the individual identifies as gay, and identity trumps act. However, as soon as the roles are reversed, everything feels highly suspect. If a straight man has sex with a man, how can he still be straight?
I posit that this suspicion comes from the nature of the LGBT identity as self-selecting. Because sexual orientation is unlike other forms of identity, which are typically seen as inscribed on the body at birth — race, gender, ability — sexual orientation and identity can only be known by the individual. You mark it yourself, ideally, if and when you are ready to do so.
At the same time, we live in a hegemonically heteronormative society. What this means is that “straight” is the presumed default. So, while the gay man must internalize, come to terms with and re-present his sexuality back out into the world, the straight man simply has to be born. Everyone is straight until proven guilty.
This puts straight people in a tenuous position, as their sexual identities never have to be proven outside of the act of sex. Which is why, I believe, straight men who hook up with other men are regarded with such sexual suspicion. To the third party observer, these identities have gone unchecked and unquestioned, and because of this, it is unclear if these actions are part of the individual’s preference and identity or the beginning of a self-exploration process that may end in a gay declarative.
So, to Ward’s Not Gay point, I think straight men can engage in homosexual sex and still be deemed socially acceptably straight, if and only if they too come out — as straight. Rather than simply accepting their unmarked, default straight identity, they should have to interrogate, work through, accept and ultimately present their sexuality back out to the world.
Everyone should go through this process of self-identification. Think about what you prefer. Why do you prefer it? Are you OK with that? If the answer is yes, keep going. Keep questioning it. Keep rethinking what it is that you like and how it changes. And if and when you’re ready to tell the world, do it, unabashed and unashamed.
I honestly believe that if everyone did this, the world would be a more understanding place. Through the process of sexual and preference based interrogation, people would realize that sexuality is a fluid spectrum, with preferences ebbing and flowing through all forms of attraction. And while identity may encompass specific subsets of these spectrums, the mere act of questioning them individually would do away with much of the long held beliefs, assumptions, and prejudices surrounding marriage, partnership and equal rights.
So, bottom line: coming out shouldn’t just be for the gays. It should be for everyone — a coming of age process that all people are lucky enough to take part in. And if you do that and bro-jobs are still your thing, by all means, proceed. No questions asked.

Filed Under: Book Reviews Tagged With: Jane Ward, straight men, white men

Xavier Dolan Is On The Run In Exclusive Clip From Thriller 'Tom At The Farm'

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

The 26-year-old filmmaker is back in front of the camera.

Headshot of Erin Whitney
Erin WhitneyEntertainment Writer, The Huffington Post
Posted: 08/11/2015 08:56 AM EDT | Edited: 08/11/2015 11:52 AM EDT
AMPLIFY RELEASING / CLARA PALARDY

French-Canadian filmmaker Xavier Dolan is back in front of the camera in his latest film, “Tom at the Farm.” The psychological thriller marks the first time the 26-year-old writer-director-actor has ventured into a genre film.
“Tom at the Farm,” which debuted at the 2013 Venice Film Festival and finally opens in the U.S. this week, follows the death of Tom’s (Dolan) lover Guillaume. When Tom travels from the city to the countryside for the funeral, he learns that the family knows little of his existence. While Guillaume’s mother (Lise Roy) was expecting a visit from her son’s non-existent girlfriend, the brother Francis (Pierre-Yves Cardinal) quickly understands who Tom is and is adamant to keep his late brother’s sexuality from their mother, even with violence.
In an exclusive clip from the film, scored by Oscar-winning composer Gabriel Yared (“The English Patient”), Tom attempts to escape the family farmhouse after an abusive altercation with Francis.

“Tom at the Farm” opens on Aug. 14

Filed Under: Movie Reviews Tagged With: Tom At The Farm, Xavier Dolan

Same-sex marriage is legal…..

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

But as a gay teenager in Utah, I keep one foot in the closet.

by William Wheeler on July 30, 2015

I’m a teenager. Seventeen, a senior, class of 2016. I’m Hispanic, middle-class, a hard worker. I live in Utah. And I’m gay. That’s the part everyone pays attention to around here.
I didn’t always live out here. I was born in New York City. I grew up for a while in a series of identical tri-state suburbs. Then my father lost his job in the ’08 crash, and we lost all our money along with it.
The house went first, then the car. We lived in hotels and cabins half-abandoned in the woods. Our lives were held up by a string of good luck days. Once, the car broke down on the side of the road the night before Thanksgiving. An old couple happened by, complete strangers — they let us borrow their Mercedes. They had three. That kind of a good luck day.
In 2013 our savings ran dry. We couldn’t pay rent. We had family in Salt Lake City willing to finance our excursion and to let us stay with them for a while. My mother decided it was time to move west.
My friends told me it would be a culture shock; they worried I could get jumped, assaulted, or excluded because of my sexuality. I ignored them, chalking their fears up to too much media hype over the LGBTQ community’s fight for rights, some lazy stereotype about red states. I thought that no place in America could be that bad.
But I was wrong. I was spoiled by New York. Here’s what I’ve learned living as a gay teenager in Utah.

Homophobia is the norm (even under the guise of acceptance)

“One foot in the closet.” That’s how I’ve described my situation. I’m out to close friends and am comfortable with myself, but the vast majority of people I interact with on a daily basis think I’m straight. I doubt I’ll ever tell them otherwise, because almost everyone, no matter how accepting or open-minded they appear on the outside, is at least a little homophobic.
I made the mistake of being too frivolous with my sexuality early on in my Utah life. Back in New York, I was out to practically my whole school by sophomore year. I was an active participant in the Gay-Straight Alliance and would give anyone who asked directly, “Are you gay?” a straight yes. (I valued those with enough courage to ask me directly rather than listen to rumors.) I think people respected me for it. I was one of the first people in the relatively small, fringe-rural school to openly declare my sexuality with pride.
When I arrived in Utah, I tried to repeat the process. No rumors and respect this time: I bombed like a lukewarm blockbuster, quickly and quietly.

More from First Person

If I’m lucky, I can have a five-minute conversation about my sexuality with a friend, cold and uninspired. “Yeah,” one of them might say, “my aunt is lesbian, but we don’t really talk to her much.” They’ll avoid it like a cliff without a guardrail, punctuate sentences with sighs; “gay marriage is legalized now,” they may say with a straight face. Even modest, passing comments about a cute boy in English class are met as if I’m coming out all over again, as if they’re just remembering: Oh right. You’re still gay.
I don’t need to talk nonstop about how I like it in bed; I’ll always be the first to say that there’s so much more to people than their sexuality. But I don’t feel truly open. Even people who will smile and say they’re “accepting” are hesitant to ever bring up the topic again, against attending even a vaguely LGBTQ-related event, closed off when you ask them for advice related to sexuality. (Of course, you’re still expected to be their wingman for straight pickups. A gay guy is always less intimidating as a sideline bestie.)
Acceptance here is a promise not to jump you in the parking lot, but it’s nothing more than that. Be gay, fine, but don’t come to our dances — one of these once-every-six-weeks affairs where kids drop $2,000 in a single night— with a same-sex partner. Don’t expect to make much contact, either: On the dance floor the closest thing you’ll get to same-sex partying is a sweaty soon-to-be frat boy accidentally bumping into you while falling out of the mosh pit.
I’ve gone with women to these things before. The expectation is always the same: You’ll drive around, maybe you’ll try some Vicodin or Oxy, probably you’ll end up making out with your date on some person’s couch, somewhere in town, tired and sweaty from dancing too long. Or you’re a prude. Or you’re not a good Utahan, where all the conservative, religious stigma in the state can’t stop some liberal rule bending around heterosexual sex, so long as you don’t mention “the gays.” If you do, it’s stares and disapproval all around, even from the “accepting” ones.

High school support networks are abysmal

If you’re like me, unable to break the barriers of the gay clique at your local high school (assuming there even is one), you’re left with the internet. You can go to chat rooms and liberal havens like Tumblr in an attempt to feel included in some kind of community or support network, but that’s all.
I’ve never attended the GSA at my Utah school, but from secondhand accounts I know it’s pretty much a facade. The club consists mainly of straight “allies” (read: more pseudo-supporters, vain acceptors) who come to eat food and talk to friends and perhaps, once, mention an issue related to the LGBTQ community before returning to their snacks.
It’s not like they’ve had any backing from the school administration; the GSA isn’t listed on the official student handbook as a chartered student group, and it is for all intents and purposes banned from advertising events beyond word of mouth.
The GSA in New York was years ahead of this one. Sure, we were underfunded, and we clashed with the school administration on more than one occasion. But we were a presence. We planned and executed the first-ever Pride Week in our area, devoting each day of the week to a different sexual minority and celebrating diversity in sexuality. We made the local news. At our largest meetings we drew in around 30 kids; I’d be hard-pressed to find 30 kids at my current school in Utah who can even name what all the letters in LGBT Q stand for, let alone define those terms past G.
Which leaves a scary hole in the support network of Utah that everyone seems keen to ignore. Last year, a student at my Utah high school committed suicide. Two years ago, another local high school had five suicides within nine months. I don’t know how many of those, if any, were motivated by sexuality. But back in my New York school, we never had a single one.

In a way, the flamboyant ones have it easier

I’m not flamboyant. On the outside, I “look straight,” “talk straight,” “walk straight.” When I came out in New York, at the beginning of my freshman year, reactions from friends and family landed largely between shock and denial. Never a pregnant pause waiting for the second half of the sentence. Never: “I knew it all along.”
I think if I were more like what people imagine when they think of a gay teenager, coming out in a place like Utah might have been easier. The flamboyant ones know what to do after they come out. They cluster into cliques and circles, backs turned out to shield each other from bigotry. Everyone knows the crowd that hangs in the choir classroom at lunch is “the gay crowd,” and if you don’t like it, you don’t have to see it. Sure, there’s a lot of talk about them behind their backs, rumors spread about who’s with who — sometimes they’re even beacons for bullies to prey on, verbally and physically.
But at the end of the day it’s a brotherhood bound together by a common knowledge of each other’s sexual orientation and the way the world deems them second-tier. The more a society pressures them, the more they push back in any way they can. Call it equal and opposite, hair dyed cyan and pink as a warning to all those bigots who pass: This is not your crowd. We are not your friends.
I am not part of this club. I never have been, and I likely never will be. I look too much like the straight guys who have oppressed them for too long; they’re understandably wary of letting me in. Why would you trust someone who looks like a threat? This is an exclusive club, and admission requirements are fierce: a strut like Beyoncé, a rainbow flag buttoned to your backpack, and a wrist flip as you tell off an outsider.
But I’m an outsider to the mainstream too. I’m stuck. I’m not flamboyant enough for the gay clique, not fraternal enough for straight culture. But here in Utah, there’s hardly a middle ground.

Straight guys are a lot more willing to be touchy

I recently went on a field trip that involved rooming with three other guys. Two were acquaintances, one I hardly knew at all. We were paired up, assigned two to each bed, and I discovered something strange: The other guys became remarkably close, in a way that would be considered borderline sexual back in New York.
I would come back from a coffee run in the lobby to find two of them lying side by side under the blankets in bed, eyes gleaming at each other, talking in hushed voices like girls at a slumber party. Games of footsie were common, and sharing of household items —socks and deodorant — was a daily occurrence. They had no qualms about being naked in front of each other, even if I demurred. Sweat and secrets: That Hilton room became a den of testosterone and camaraderie for a good four days. I was shocked.
But in retrospect, it makes sense.
In a conservative state like Utah, we don’t talk about gays. There’s never an assumption that anyone is gay; the few who exist are the ones in the choir room, relegated to their own social circles. Otherwise it isn’t a part of ordinary life.
The idea that someone could appear masculine and also be gay is ridiculous in a society like this; more than ridiculous, it just isn’t considered. So there’s no fear of footsie. There’s no worrying about what the late-night pillow fights or stark, aloof nudity in the hotel room mean, because it will always be just two straight buddies playing around.
It’s the same sort of attitude you see in organized sports: Butt slapping in the locker room is no big deal until one guy out of 20 is gay, and then it’s weird because what if he means something by it? What if he hits on me?
In a strange way, it’s almost more sexually liberating than the climate back in New York. Men aren’t afraid of being labeled homosexual, so there’s no reason to hide a brotherly love. My first time in a Utah locker room featured multiple men openly stripping down, showing it all, and nobody batting an eye. While doing a bench press, my spotter shoved his groin in my face. “You don’t want this, do you?” he asked, prompting me to move down on the bench. It was casual, fraternal.
But this is the height of heteronormativity. Homophobic slurs are still casual, part of the cultural norm. “You don’t want this, do you?” No, of course I don’t. Because I’m straight. It doesn’t even need to be clarified.

The oases of open-mindedness are that much more special

The pressure to conform is intense for everyone in high school, but arguably no teenage minority group has received more attention in recent years than the LGBTQ community. Teenage LGBTQ suicides are marks of a time we can only hope is coming to an end, albeit slowly. Gay marriage is now legalized nationwide, but there’s more work to be done. Homophobia is an ugly illness in the midst of being treated, but it will be generations before the symptoms are gone — if they ever disappear at all.
Too many areas of the country are still caught up in past decades, openly oppressing those who don’t fall into the mainstream, those who are too loud or flamboyant, “too gay to pass.” A typical day is filled with a million subtle, mostly unintentional digs at a piece of who I am. Every passive comment between buddies about a “hot chick” or “cute babe” is a reminder that you’re different. It’s the definition of living as a minority: The world is built for the powerful, and you aren’t it.
I’ve lived here for almost 18 months. I have another year before I can leave the state for college. I’ve realized in that time that the people who accept you — truly accept you, not just on a surface level — are the people you remember most.
My best friends, interestingly, have not been met inside school; rather, they’ve been met at the oases of open-mindedness: coffee shops and universities, queer-centered events. I don’t disregard the love I garnered in New York, but it was ultimately expected. It’s a place bound to accept people of all personalities, sexualities, shapes, and sizes.
In Utah, acceptance is hard sought and, therefore, much more precious when it’s found. I know the network of friends I’ve made here will last because it’s built on a mutual drive, a fight against that which cages us. I know we are a force to be reckoned with. It’s much more than equal and opposite. We want to push back, at least in the little ways.
William Wheeler is a high school student living in Salt Lake City with his family.

Filed Under: History Tagged With: marriage equality, same sex marriage, Utah

Barcelona's Circuit Festival

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Going to Spain this year, have you been to Spain this year, did you go to Barcelona’s Circuit Festival?
 
Curtis M. Wong, Senior Editor, HuffPost Gay Voices has written an indepth article with superb photographs which will have you drooling!  I will give you one example here and then you will have to click on the link to find the rest:
 

BARCELONA, SPAIN - AUGUST 11:  Festival goers enjoy the atmosphere at Isla Fantasia Water Park as part of the Circuit Festival on August 11, 2015 in Barcelona, Spain. The Circuit Festival is considered the Europe's biggest gay and lesbian festival. More than 70,000 people flock to Barcelona every August to enjoy 12 days of parties and activities around the city. Festival goers are expeted to spend about 150 million euros during the Festival. The Festival was born in Barcelona in 2008  by the Matinee Group and nowadays they are organizing similar festival in more than 20 countries such as Dubai, Russia and Israel.  (Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)

BARCELONA, SPAIN – AUGUST 11: Festival goers enjoy the atmosphere at Isla Fantasia Water Park as part of the Circuit Festival on August 11, 2015 in Barcelona, Spain. The Circuit Festival is considered the Europe’s biggest gay and lesbian festival. More than 70,000 people flock to Barcelona every August to enjoy 12 days of parties and activities around the city. Festival goers are expeted to spend about 150 million euros during the Festival. The Festival was born in Barcelona in 2008 by the Matinee Group and nowadays they are organizing similar festival in more than 20 countries such as Dubai, Russia and Israel. (Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)


 
Click Here Red Button
 
 

Filed Under: History Tagged With: Barcelona Circuit Festival, Spain

Why aren't schools educating kids against sex abuse?

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Sex education: Give pupils knowledge, skills & confidence to resist abusers
By Peter Tatchell
International Business Times – London, UK – 20 August 2015
READ & COMMENT: http://ibt.uk/A006MQq
Generic Child AbuseThe sexual abuse of children is a national scandal. So why are schools doing so little to help combat it? This neglect is outrageous, given that educating and empowering young people with sexual rights, knowledge, skills and confidence can help protect them against abuse.
The current UK anti-child sex abuse strategy focuses overwhelmingly on apprehending and prosecuting abusers. That’s good and important. But it is a somewhat one-sided approach. It neglects the very important, effective role that young people can play in stopping abuse.
The shocking scale of child sexual exploitation proves that criminal sanctions are not enough. They aren’t working. The already strong laws against abuse are being flouted, as shown by the constant stream of sex abuse trials. Tougher penalties are unlikely to deter or make much difference. More robust investigation and prosecution will definitely help a lot. But what’s also urgently needed are new initiatives that help young people protect themselves.
Most sexual abuse does not involve explicit coercion or violence. Psychological pressure and manipulation are more common.
It is therefore astonishing that young people are not being advised about the warning signs of grooming and given sexual assertiveness training to deter and repel predators. These issues are not a mandatory part of a national curriculum that is obligatory for all schools.
Indeed, the issue of abuse is not adequately – if at all – discussed in most schools. It should be talked about as preventative education, but it isn’t. Most teachers don’t advise young people about sex abuse and what to do if they are molested. Telling them to phone Childline is not good enough.
Fending off a predatory older (or younger) person is not easy, even for adults. It is an acquired skill, and it requires a degree of confidence. Young people therefore need to be taught the ability and assuredness to resist and report unwanted sexual advances.
Assertiveness skills can be taught and, once learned, can empower teens to rebuff pressure from abusers, whether they are older or of similar ages. Although this may not work for everyone, it will work for some. Even if this education prevents only a minority of children from falling victim to sexual exploitation, it would be worthwhile.
We also need to look at the bigger picture: the social values that often unwittingly and unintentionally underpin the abuse of children.
Sex-negative attitudes are a contributory factor. People who sexually exploit youngsters often get away with it because the victims feel embarrassed and ashamed about sex and are therefore reluctant to report it. This shame and embarrassment is reinforced by a cultural mix of prudery and puritanism, which tends to regard sex as something sordid that should be kept hidden and private. This anti-sex mentality is a godsend to abusers. They rely on shame and secrecy to carry out their molestation undetected.
To undermine the sexual shame that inhibits the exposure of abusers, sex and relationship lessons in schools should encourage young people to have a more open, positive attitude towards sexual matters and to feel less inhibited about discussing them. Teenagers who feel at ease talking about sex are more likely to disclose abuse. Prompt reporting is the key to stopping sexual exploitation.
The other problematic social value that needs to be challenged is adult chauvinism, which is best summed up in the old adage that children should be seen and not heard. This, again, plays into the hands of abusers. Not infrequently, they get away with molestation by relying on the young victim’s reticence to challenge an adult; especially if the adult has a position of authority over them or has prestigious social standing. The fear (and reality) of disbelief by adults when reporting abuse is very strong, as many victims have reported.
Despite child-centred legal reforms in the UK over the last three decades, children’s rights remain somewhat contradictory and confused – especially in the realm of sexual rights.
According to the law, a person under 16 is incapable of consenting to a sexual act. They are deemed unable to understand the implications of having sex. Any sexual relationship with such a person, even if freely entered into by both partners of similar ages, is therefore categorised, in law, as a criminal offence.
By saying that the under-16s are not allowed to consent to a sexual relationship, the unspoken message is that they have no sexual rights – no right to control their own body and make their own decisions. This is the precise mind-set of abusers.
Curiously, the UK age of criminal responsibility is ten. From that age onwards, the law says that a person who commits a crime, such as murder, can be assumed to know what they were doing and can therefore be held responsible for their behaviour. But it is not until the age of 16 that the law acknowledges young people’s ability to give sexual consent. The bizarre implication is that a decision to have consenting sex requires greater mental maturity, and is more complex and grave, than a decision to kill.
The ten-year-old killers of James Bulger were declared by the courts to be old enough to understand, and to be held responsible for, their actions – and mature enough be convicted of murder. But if they’d had sex with each other and said they had consented, the courts would have ruled that they were too young to understand what is involved in a sexual relationship – and therefore incapable of giving their consent.
This points to the legal muddle over the sexual rights of youth. Parliament rightly seeks to safeguard against abuse. It sets the age of consent at 16. But by denying the under-16s the right to consent to sex, it reinforces the idea that they have no right to make their own sexual choices. Isn’t this also what child sex abusers believe? That teens have no right to decide?
I am not saying that sex involving young people under 16 should be lawful. I am merely pointing out the inconsistencies; that the law seems to inadvertently help legitimate the disempowering attitudes that allow abuse to flourish.
To combat abusive relations, all schools should be legally required to educate young people about consent and abuse issues, give them sexual assertiveness training and positively encourage a culture of young people’s rights; including the right to control their own bodies. This includes the right to say ‘no’ to unwanted sex (whatever the age of the other person) and the right and responsibility to report attempted and actual abusers.
A useful sex and relationship education mantra might be: “It’s my body. It’s my right to decide.”
This affirmation of teenagers’ right to sexual self-determination, and their education and empowerment to assert that right against abusers, should be mandatory in every school. Over to you, Education Secretary, Nicky Morgan.

  • For more information about the Peter Tatchell Foundation’s human rights work, to receive our email bulletins or to make a donation:www.PeterTatchellFoundation.org

Filed Under: Campaigns Tagged With: child abuse, Peter Thatchell

The Warwick Rowers are back, raising money for gay rights, and they’re more naked than ever

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Not suitable for work: We have got seven shots teasing their 2016 naked calendar

The Warwick Rowers raise money for gay rights by posing naked once again
Screengrab

The Warwick Rowers are back, raising money for gay rights, and they’re more naked than ever

20 August 2015 by Joe Morgan

The Warwick Rowers are back, and these British boys are baring all once again to raise money for gay rights.

The university rowing team have teased their brand new 2016 naked calendar.
Once again, the money raised will go to supporting young people who are challenged by bullying, homophobia or low-self esteem in sport through Sports Allies.
And we have got a few shots to make the wait worthwhile. Some are from their new calendar, some from their new coffee table book, and some are from behind the scenes.
Warwick_Rowers_3
Warwick_Rowers_6
Warwick_Rowers_2Warwick_Rowers_4
Warwick_Rowers_1
Warwick_Rowers_7
Head over to the Warwick Rowers website to see all of their offers and their teaser video.

Filed Under: Book Reviews, Campaigns Tagged With: gay rights, Warwick Rowers

Belfast Pride 2015: sea of colour and party atmosphere as parade gets underway

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

 
 

Thousands of participants and supporters take part in the 25th annual Belfast Pride parade on August 1, 2015 in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Thousands of participants and supporters take part in the 25th annual Belfast Pride parade on August 1, 2015 in Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Pride-Crowded Boulevard Pride-High Stepping Pride Beetle

Thousands of people joined in the fun of the 25th annual Pride parade in Belfast on Saturday.


Organisers said they expect a bigger turnout than usual at the parade following the Yes vote in the Republic’s referendum on same-sex marriage and subsequent push for marriage equality in Northern Ireland.
Belfast Pride website says the organisers wanted the even to be “a big, positive celebration of the 25th anniversary of Belfast Pride as well a celebration of our community and our place in the city”.
Meanwhile a small group of protesters clutching placards displaying Bible verses gathered at Belfast City Hall in opposition to the event.
View photos from the event in the gallery above.

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia, History Tagged With: Belfast Pride 2015

Straight Talk With Years & Years' Olly Alexander, the U.K.'s New Gay Pop Star

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

The lead vocalist for Brit trio Years & Years opens up about his past and his plan to change the global landscape for out artists.

BY JASE PEEPLES

AUGUST 03 2015 3:00 AM ET

Pictured above: synth-pop trio Years & Years, Emre Turkmen (left), Olly Alexander (center), and Mikey Goldsworthy (right)

Like many young people, Olly Alexander had dreams of stardom from an early age.
“I grew up loving artists like the Spice Girls and Britney Spears — artists who seemed to live this fantasy lifestyle, and I remember always wanting to join these fantasy people in that world,” he says, slightly embarrassed. “But as I got older I began to think, Maybe I really could be a singer or musician.”
Today, the 25-year-old Yorkshire native is living that dream together with his band mates, Mikey Goldsworthy and Emre Turkmen, as the synth-pop trio Years & Years. It’s a reality that began taking shape when the group’s breakout hit, “King” — an infectious track that perfectly captures the feeling of one wanting to escape the confines of a possessive love — shot to number 1 in the U.K. and cracked the coveted Billboard U.S. Mainstream Top 40 this spring. The track’s music video, which has racked up more than 67 million plays on YouTube, is a testament to the power of the spell this British band has cast, and it shows no sign of fading anytime soon.
The release of the band’s debut album in July, Communion, has continued to propel the group’s rising star; topping charts around the globe including Billboard’s U.S. Dance/Electronic Albums chart.
Nevertheless, Alexander is taking the band’s early success in stride. “I don’t know if there’s ever a point where you go, ‘Oh, I’m successful now. Look at all this great stuff I’ve done,’ because I don’t think it can be tangible in that way,” he says. “Maybe that’s because I’m still not used to any of it and it still feels strange and that kind of numbs things, like when [I hear one of our songs has] 67 million hits on YouTube. It’s so difficult to comprehend that many people. I try not to think about it too much.”

On the surface, Years & Years’ success story doesn’t appear to be much different than that of any other breakout band. However, Alexander’s decision to live as an out gay man in both his private and public life has made him a rare find in today’s mainstream pop music landscape. But it’s his insistence on using male pronouns in two of the album’s tracks that has secured the singer’s spot as a trailblazer.
“Growing up, many of my favorite songs were mainly ‘you and I’ type of relationship songs that weren’t gender-specific, and I loved those songs because they were universal, but it was important to me to get some male pronouns in there on this album because we don’t have enough songs like that,” he says. “I feel very lucky because there was never, to my knowledge, anyone standing in the way of that, and I don’t think I could’ve worked with anyone who did. But my whole team has been really supportive.”
Alexander says he was emboldened to reference his sexuality in his music after witnessing the way in which crowds embraced Sam Smith when Years & Years toured with the out singer throughout Europe last year. “After touring with Sam I realized most of his fans are women, and they didn’t care in the slightest that he was gay,” he says, brushing off the old misconception that heterosexual female fans would lose interest in out artists. “So why [would my being out] change the way our female fans treat us?”
He suspects his comfort level with being out in the public eye is due in part to the unconditional support of his mother — who was so unfazed by her son’s sexuality, he had to come out to her twice.
“It’s funny, I came out to her once on the phone when I was 19 and living in London,” he says. “I remember telling her, ‘I’m having a terrible time living in London, I hate everything, and I’m gay!’ She just listened, said, ‘Cool,’ and then we talked about something else. Then a year or two later, when she asked me what I was up to one day, I told her that I’d just got back from Paris and I was seeing a guy. She said, ‘Oh, are you telling me that you’re gay?’ and I had to remind her, ‘Um, I’ve already said this to you, Mum.’”
He stops and laughs before continuing. “I come from a single-parent family and my Mum is super liberal. She had gay friends when I was growing up and I was aware she had gay friends, so I always knew my Mum would never have any problem.”

But while Alexander isn’t afraid to live an authentic life in the spotlight, he says he was terrified the first time he played a song he’d written about his boyfriend — Clean Bandit violinist Neil Milan Amin-Smith — for his muse.
“I wanted to crawl in a hole and die,” Alexander admits. “It was really horrible because I didn’t care if anyone else liked it or not, and I know he would’ve said he liked it, but it really mattered to me whether he truly liked it or not. But he did, and I was so relieved.”
His love is not the only one who approves of the song. “Shine,” the third track on Communion, has proved to be an excellent follow-up single to the band’s smash hit “King,” claiming the number 2 spot on the U.K. Singles chart and landing comfortably among the top 50 of Billboard’s U.S. Hot Dance/Electronic Songs. “I have an intense feeling for all the songs on the album, but I feel really attached to “Shine” because it’s the most positive track on the whole album, and it was quite difficult to write a song like that,” he says. “I never did anything like it before, and I’m so glad I was able to pull it off.”
Nevertheless, Alexander hopes the day isn’t far away when men openly singing about the men they love will no longer be a rarity, and he’s working toward a future where LGBT youth will have more than straight female pop divas to look up to.
“I’m a big believer that if you want things to change you have to embody that change,” he says, “and that’s what I’m trying to do.

Filed Under: Music Reviews Tagged With: Olly Alexander, Years & Years

Greg Louganis On How His Life Has Changed for the Better

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

 

With the documentary about his hardships debuting on HBO, the Olympic athlete reflects on downsizing his life and finding happiness.

 
BY JERRY PORTWOOD
AUGUST 03 2015 3:35 PM EDT
 
The documentary Greg Louganis: Back on Board was a hit at festivals a year ago, but with its debut on HBO Sports this week, the heartbreaking story of one of America’s greatest athletes will finally reach millions of households who may not be aware of the diver’s ups and downs since he was in the spotlight.
Directed by Cheryl Furjanic and produced by Furjanic and Will Sweeney, the film about the four-time Olympic gold medalist comes at a pivotal time when acute attention is being paid to LGBT athletes, especially after Caitlyn Jenner came out as trans this year and the debut of the docuseries I Am Cait on E! is creating heightened trans awareness. The fact that some have questioned whether Jenner deserved her medals after the revelation, is a sore point for Louganis as well since people had tried to take his medals after coming out as HIV-positive. But it was Louganis’s husband, Johnny Chaillot who informed Louganis of the similarity.
“I had no idea since I don’t read my press,” Louganis explains, while sipping coffee in a Midtown New York City hotel with his dog Dobby at his feet. “I had competed in the ’88 Seoul Olympics while HIV-positive, and some people said I shouldn’t have been allowed in the country. I’m kind of glad I didn’t know it, but it made me think: How can you deny somebody, especially a physical achievement like that? You can’t take that performance away. It stands on its own.”
Chaillot and Louganis were married in California in the fall of 2013 — and it’s a happy turning point included in the film — and since then, Chaillot has helped Louganis get many of his affairs in order and donated a trove of memorabilia to the National LGBT Museum, which plans to open its doors in New York City in 2019. “They now have the largest collection of Greg Louganis memorabilia collection in the world,” Chaillot says. “Hopefully they are going to do a preview of Greg’s stuff since next year since it’s an Olympic year. We kept some of the bigger items” — including medals from each of the Olympics — “But we donated items like Speedos he wore in competitions and the 1988 sweater he wore in Seoul, so these things would be in a place where the whole world can see them.”
Since the film begins with Louganis in dire financial straits and about to lose his Malibu home, we wanted to know how his life has changed since the filming took place and find out where he’s living these days.
Out: Was it odd that the film starts with you and the house and your financial situation?
Greg Louganis: When I first saw it, I got a little nervous. I think it was important to tell the story because it wasn’t unique: This was happening across the country with loans and the 2006 black mold scare. I know how empowering it can be to know that someone else has been through that. I think it was an important story to tell within the documentary. But we sold the house last year. It was kind of bittersweet, I lived there 29 years. But now we’re completely out of debt. I was able to pay my taxes, my loan, paid for our wedding. Now we have a whole new fresh start.

Greg Louganis

In many ways, the message of the film seems to be a cautionary tale for athletes and families of athletes to make them aware that you aren’t going to be “golden” your entire life.
Right. That’s why I wanted to talk about mentoring U.S. divers. It’s not just about getting to the Olympics and performing well at the games. What happens after? When you retire from your sport, you’re still pretty young and you almost lose your identity. To go through that process of: Now what do I do? I didn’t know what my passion was going to be. I’ve seen it with the other athletes, you reach a certain age, and you need something else to move to.
One of the more poignant lines from the documentary is when you explain that, having a coach who told you what to do, you never had to think about how to live your life. Do you have any advice for people who have that sort of relationship so it doesn’t necessarily translate into other parts of their lives?
My coach was trustworthy, and I trusted him. We were together for 10 years, so I trust him implicitly. I always knew he had my best interest at heart, but in the “real world” not everyone is trustworthy, so that was a real hard lesson for me to learn. I kept making the same mistakes again and again, but I needed to learn those lessons. I don’t have any regrets, but I would like, in an ideal world, for other athletes and performers and whomever would hear that and not make the same mistakes. Part of that is learning what questions to ask or doing the research, now that we have the Internet, you can look people up and do background checks.
SLIDESHOW: Champions: Heroes, Past and Present, Who Play For Our Team
One of the other details revealed in the doc that I didn’t know about: You never had a Wheaties box. I know it’s not the biggest accoldate, but I never realized that you were overlooked in that way.
You know what, I didn’t either until I was working with Cheryl on the documentary, and we were at the International Swimming Hall of Fame where they had all the Wheaties boxes lined up of all the aquatic athletes. It’s box after box after box, of some rather obscure names, and I’m going, “Oh my god, I am nowhere in that group.”
What did that feel like to realize that oversight?
Well that first came out with the book in ’95. I thought, Oh yeah, whatever. I didn’t really know the significance of it until we started working on Back on Board and I saw all the boxes and realized, I’m not there. That was the first time it really struck me what the significance of that was. I realized why people were upset.
But two of the reasons you thought were that there were rumors that you were gay or you felt you weren’t “All-American” enough. But that made me think about people wondering if that would affect Caitlyn Jenner in some way: Would Wheaties do something now that she came out as transgender or would the OIC take away her medals?
I marched in the opening ceremonies with Bruce in 1976. I was on the Tour of Champions with Medco, and they always put me with Bruce and Mark [Spitz], and between the two of them I couldn’t get a word in edgewise. I know these people. Then the whole Kardashian thing. I don’t watch TV so I don’t know, I haven’t seen the show.
I wasn’t sharing the Caitlyn sensationalism angle, but I read about trans-exploitation, a term I had heard before, and discussed it with Johnny and what the implications can be. So that was news to me. I did Larry Kramer’s Just Say No with Alexandra Billings, and Alexandra taught me so much about her journey transitioning. That’s been my education. The thing about it is we talk about the LGBT community, but we’re really not informed as a community. I know a lot about the G, and I have wonderful relations with the L in LGBT, but the B, I’m not quite as sure, but I have a better sensitivity to it by viewing sexuality as much more fluid. But I knew nothing about the T in LGBT, so to do that show with Alexandra, I had an education and how to talk respectfully. It’s almost like learning a whole new language. Also, RuPaul is a friend. And RuPaul, he or she, it’s whatever I’m dressed as, that’s how you address me.
Personally, I kind of bristle with the whole “girlfriend” and “she” thing. Someone called me “Oh, girl” or “her” or something like that. And I said, “Excuse me?” I said I’m a man and I’m proud to be a man. I appreciate camp and there’s a time and a place for that but to somebody you don’t know, it can be rather inappropriate.
RELATED | VOWS: Greg Louganis & Johnny Chaillot
One of the happiest moments takes place after we see you selling off your memorabilia and medals to save your house, and then you meet Johnny, and you find happiness. Was that something you think the filmmakers were looking for?
I wasn’t in the editing process at all. I relinquished all the creative control, but having built that relationship with Cheryl, she was like my therapist who I would go to. And the crew, too. They lived with us through this, too. One of the crewmembers was going through the same thing I was going through. I just reconnected with him recently and I found out he was also able to get out of the debt and sell his house and he’s moved on.
Now Johnny and I are very cautious about her finances. We’re living well within our means so we can put money aside. We know where we’re at right now is temporary [Chaillot’s one-bedroom Beverly Hills apartment, which he describes as cramped, but “very Gloria Swanson.] It’s affordable and we don’t have to worry where the next job is coming from. We don’t have that pressure. With that lifted, it enables us to have much more freedom.

Links:

  • Greg Louganis – 30 Years Later: The Same Cereal Box, a New Perspective

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia, Community Journalist, TV programme reviews Tagged With: Back Story, Diver, Greg Louganis, HBO, Living the dream, sportsman

Neighbours Goes Gay… Hurrah

21/08/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

By The Gay UK, Aug 4 2015 09:10AM
 

Neighbours has gone all gay on us, and naturally we’re excited as all butter.

Channel 5

Channel 5
Male on male kissing in Neighbours? As a young boy watching the Aussie export, I thought I’d never see the day, but here we are as Nate and Aaron have a tumble in bed.
Nate and Aaron take part in Naomi's Lassiter's campaign

Nate and Aaron take part in Naomi’s Lassiter’s campaign

The steamy scene which aired last week here in the UK, saw characters Aaron Brennan (Matt Wilson) and Nate Kinski (Meyne Wyatt) share their first kiss on screen, but it wasn’t a private moment. No they did it in front of an audience. They were doing it as part of a promotion stunt for Lassiter’s hotel. In our opinion they should have sold tickets.
So let’s get this straight, put two ridic hot lads into a glass box, give them an audience… and they start kissing? Okay, we need to get the Cube installed in the office.

 

Filed Under: TV programme reviews Tagged With: Aaron, Nate, Neighbours

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 11
  • Next Page »

Categories

Copyright ACOMSDave.com © 2026