ACOMSDave

Community Journalist

  • Home
  • Community Journalist
  • Events
  • Media Page and Press Kit
    • Projects and Work
  • Resources & Documents
    • LGBTQ+ Support Groups and Documents
  • NIGRA
  • Archives
  • Contact

Archives for October 2025

Jean Genet – Un Chant d’Amour – Movie Review

14/10/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

 

Un Chant d’Amour – Jean Genet’s Silent Cry of Desire

Jean Genet’s Un Chant d’Amour (1950) remains one of the most haunting and poetic portrayals of forbidden desire ever committed to film. This 26-minute black-and-white short — the only film Genet ever directed — is both stark and lyrical, a work born out of confinement, yearning, and resistance.

For years, the film was banned for what was seen as “explicit homosexual content.” Today, those same images — bodies reaching across prison bars, smoke shared between lips, a flower trembling in the air — read not as scandalous, but as profoundly human. Genet gives us love stripped bare, fragile and defiant, a song whispered through the cracks of a cell wall.

Inside the Prison Walls

The story unfolds in a French prison where two men — one older, the other young and tattooed — are separated by thick stone and iron. Their only intimacy is through gesture and imagination: a tendril of smoke, a caress of the wall, a bouquet of wildflowers passed between bars but never received.

Hovering over them is a prison guard, a figure of authority, voyeurism, and jealousy. He spies on the prisoners’ private acts of longing, unable to understand them yet drawn inescapably toward them. When his envy turns violent, beating the older prisoner, the scene dissolves into fantasy — a pastoral escape where the two men can finally exist together, free from chains and shame.

The guard’s intrusion, particularly the disturbing moment when he forces the prisoner to simulate oral sex with his gun, serves as Genet’s commentary on power, repression, and the perverse relationship between control and desire. The final image — a hand grasping the long-offered flowers — completes the film’s circle of longing: love reaching out through impossibility.

A Silent Language of the Body

Genet forgoes dialogue entirely. Instead, the film speaks in close-ups — of torsos, faces, armpits, penises — each frame both sensual and symbolic. It’s cinema as pure visual poetry. The camera lingers not to titillate, but to witness. Every movement, every breath, becomes an act of resistance against invisibility.

At a time when queer love was criminalised and pathologised, Un Chant d’Amour dared to look directly, unapologetically, at the erotic. It’s not pornography, as its censors claimed, but a meditation on longing and the human need for connection — made even more profound by its silence.

Censorship and Legacy

When the film finally surfaced in the U.S. in the 1960s, it ignited fierce legal battles. Judges labelled it “cheap pornography calculated to promote homosexuality,” banning it outright. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately upheld the ban without explanation — a quiet erasure of one of queer cinema’s first authentic expressions of desire.

And yet, like all true art, Un Chant d’Amour endured. It circulated underground, influencing generations of filmmakers, writers, and queer artists who recognised in its imagery both a mirror and a manifesto.

Critical Reflections

Today, critics recognise the film as a landmark. The Queer Encyclopedia of Film & Television calls it “one of the earliest and most remarkable attempts to portray homosexual passion on-screen.” For some, it remains “pretentious” or “curio value” — but that misses the point. Genet wasn’t making entertainment; he was crafting an act of defiance.

In Un Chant d’Amour, love becomes a subversive force — one that outlasts authority, confinement, and shame. It’s not just a film about desire; it’s a

 love letter to the silenced.

Reflection

Watching it now, Un Chant d’Amour still feels radical — not because of its nudity or its notoriety, but because of its tenderness. In its silence, Genet gives us a universal truth: that love, however repressed, finds a way to reach across the bars.

Director – Jean Genet
Writer – Jean Genet
Stars – Bravo, Jean Genet, Java

 

Links:

  • IMDB – Un Chant D’Amour
  • Amazon – Un Chant D’Amour (DVD)
  • Thirteen or So Minutes

#JeanGenet #UnChantDAmour #QueerCinema #LGBTQHistory #BannedFilms #FrenchCinema #AvantGarde #GayArt #FilmCensorship #QueerDesire #Cinephile #ClassicFilm #AcomsDave

 

 

Filed Under: Movie Reviews Tagged With: 1950s cinema, avant-garde film, banned films, eroticism in art, experimental cinema, film censorship, French cinema, homoerotic art, Jean Genet, LGBTQ+ History, prison love, queer desire, queer film, silent film, Un Chant d’Amour

Albert Camus, The Philosopher

12/10/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Albert CamusAlbert Camus, The Philosopher Who Taught Me How to Live

If you, like me, have ever stared up at the night sky and felt a profound sense of “What is the point of all this?” then you need to meet Albert Camus (1913–1960).

Camus, a Nobel laureate and journalist from French Algeria, is often mistakenly called an Existentialist. But he defined his own, arguably more comforting, philosophy: Absurdism. It’s the framework I return to whenever the world feels overwhelming. This isn’t just dusty old philosophy; it’s a manual for finding passion in a world that doesn’t care.

The Core Conflict: A Home vs. A Divorce

Camus diagnosed the fundamental problem of human existence: the Absurd. It’s not an argument; it’s a feeling.

According to Camus, the Absurd is the permanent conflict between two things (and I love the emotional language he uses in his essays, like The Myth of Sisyphus):

  1. Our innate, passionate need for meaning and clarity (we yearn for a “home”).
  2. The universe’s absolute silence and cold indifference to our questions (this is the “divorce”).

The universe simply doesn’t contain the ultimate meaning we crave. So, what do we do?

The Only Way Out: Revolt and Passionate Living

Camus laid out three responses to this tragicomic situation, and he only accepted one:

  1. Suicide: A physical escape. Camus rejected this as a cowardly refusal to confront the problem.
  2. Leap of Faith: What he called “philosophical suicide.” This means abandoning reason to embrace an artificial system (religious dogma or political ideology) to pretend meaning exists. Again, rejection.
  3. Revolt and Freedom: This is the move. It means acknowledging the Absurd completely, accepting that life has no ultimate meaning, and then living fully, intensely, and passionately despite it. You find freedom in that conscious act of defiance.

You are free the moment you stop waiting for the universe to permit you to be happy.

Where to Start: A Quick Look at His Major Works

Camus explored these ideas through beautiful, accessible novels.

  • The Stranger (L’Étranger, 1942): Meet Meursault, the detached narrator. The novel is a chilling look at what happens when a man simply refuses to play society’s game of manufactured meaning, eventually leading to tragedy. It’s a study in indifference that forces the reader to examine their own moral structures.
  • The Plague (La Peste, 1947): A powerful allegory. While it was read as a response to the German occupation of France, it’s really about human solidarity and the power of everyday effort. Dr Rieux and his companions simply choose human decency and hard work (the “revolt” in action) over nihilistic despair. If you want a book about collective resilience, start here.

The True Answer is ‘The Sea Close By’

For a feeling of his philosophy, I recommend seeking out some of his lyrical prose, like the pamphlet ‘The Sea Close By.’ These writings are drenched in the North African sun. They show Camus finding joy not in grand intellectual theories, but in the immediate, physical reality: the feel of the sea, the heat on his skin, the bright light.

This is his final answer: Happiness is found not by looking to the stars for answers, but by enjoying the tangible world right beside you.

A Final, Absurd Irony

It’s tragically fitting that Camus, the man who wrote so eloquently about the random, indifferent nature of existence, died in a sudden car crash in 1960 at age 46. The final absurd twist? He reportedly had a train ticket in his pocket but chose to drive that day.

If you’re ready to stop waiting for meaning and start creating it, Camus is your man. Grab The Stranger this weekend and tell me what you think in the comments!

 

“The bay, the sun, the red

and white games on the

seaward terraces, the

flowers and sports stadiums, 

the cool-legged girls”

 

Links:

  • Amazon – The Sea close by
  • Catflap

#AlbertCamus #Absurdism #TheStranger #ExistentialPhilosophy #BookReview #LiteraryLife

Filed Under: Book Reviews Tagged With: Absurdism, Albert Camus, existentialism, literary analysis, meaning of life, philosophy, revolt, Sisyphus, The Plague, The Stranger

Thirteen or So Minutes: A Quiet Revolution in the Span of a Coffee Break

08/10/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

 

13 or so minutes Nick Soper - 13 or so minutesShort films often struggle to justify their existence, either feeling like a rushed concept or an overlong sketch. William Branden Blinn’s award-winning Thirteen or So Minutes avoids both pitfalls by distilling a lifetime of confusion, discovery, and sudden intimacy into its brief runtime. This isn’t just a snapshot; it’s a profound seismic event that happens quietly, in a single room, between two strangers.

The setup is deceptively simple and, let’s be honest, instantly intriguing: Lawrence Jefferies (Soper) and Hugh Greerey (Salas) are two straight men who have just met. Both have a history of girlfriends. Now, a mere handful of minutes later—thirteen or so, if you want to be precise—they are left staring at the ceiling, or maybe at the wall, grappling with the fact that they’ve just spontaneously had sex.

The film’s true genius lies in what follows. Once the physical act is over, the real intimacy begins. The narrative pivots entirely to the conversation, the hesitant, vulnerable, and often comical dialogue between the two men as they attempt to map out the uncharted territory of their shared experience verbally. This isn’t about sensationalising a sudden moment of fluidity; it’s about the raw, honest human response to discovering a desire you never knew you possessed.

Soper and Salas are excellent. They play the moment not for shock, but for genuine, bewildered chemistry. You feel their confusion, their panic, and the underlying, undeniable strong desire that the Wikipedia premise refers to. Director and writer Blinn understands that the biggest stakes often exist not in explosions or car chases, but in the terrifying moment when you have to admit something true and unexpected about yourself.

By winning prizes at festivals like the Rainbow Film Festival, the film proves that its exploration of social and sexuality issues resonates powerfully. It suggests that attraction isn’t always a rigidly defined path, but sometimes a sudden, inexplicable detour. Thirteen or So Minutes is a thoughtful and essential watch that manages to convey more about the messy, beautiful complexities of human sexuality in fourteen minutes than most feature-length dramas do in two hours. A great piece of work.

 

Director: William Branden Blinn 

Writer: William Branden Blinn 

Stars: Nick Soper, Carlos Salas 

Running Time: 14 minutes

 

Links:

  • IMDB – 13 or so Minutes
  • Here TV – 13 or so Minutes
  • Oranges (2004) – A Small Story with Lasting Taste

Filed Under: Movie Reviews Tagged With: award-winning, Carlos Salas, independent film, intimacy, LGBTQ, Nick Soper, sexual fluidity, short film review, Thirteen or So Minutes, William Branden Blinn

Are Gay Economics Changing?

05/10/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Are Gay Economics Changing?

Economic stability or gay rights?

Are gay economics changing – in Northern Ireland, especially when contrasting Belfast with rural areas, spending categories within the £6bn “pink pound” model tend to shift markedly due to differences in urbanisation, income, lifestyle, and access to services.

Key Spending Category Shifts

  • Culture, Leisure, and Recreation: Belfast, as the capital and economic centre, has more vibrant cultural, entertainment, and leisure infrastructures such as theatres, galleries, nightlife, and Pride events. This drives a higher proportion of LGBTQ+ spending on dining out, entertainment, and cultural events compared to rural areas where such options are limited or less diverse.

  • Retail and Shopping: Urban residents in Belfast have greater access to a wider range of retail outlets, including speciality and LGBTQ+ friendly brands and businesses, encouraging more discretionary spending. Rural areas have fewer outlets and less variety, leading to a lower percentage spent in this category.

  • Tourism and Travel: Belfast benefits from tourism infrastructure, so LGBTQ+ consumers may spend more on accommodation, guided tours, and travel experiences locally and regionally. Rural Northern Ireland has less infrastructure and fewer events attracting LGBTQ+ tourists, reducing local spending in this category.

  • Professional and Personal Services: Access to LGBTQ+ affirming health care, counselling, beauty, and other personal services in Belfast is stronger, contributing to higher spending in personal care and wellness sectors. Rural access tends to be more limited, which can suppress spending in these areas.

  • Housing and Accommodation: Belfast presents a wider rental and property market, often with higher costs, affecting housing-related expenses. Rural areas tend to have lower housing costs, leading to lower overall spending in this sector, although ownership patterns may differ substantially.

Income and Economic Context

  • Belfast’s economy supports higher average earnings, employment opportunities, and professional sectors, which encourages higher discretionary income available for non-essential spending categories mentioned above.

  • Rural areas often face lower incomes, fewer job opportunities, and less economic dynamism, constraining consumer spending patterns overall, including within the LGBTQ+ community.

Summary

Spending on culture, leisure, retail, personal services, and travel tends to increase significantly when focusing on Belfast’s urban LGBTQ+ population compared to rural Northern Ireland, driven by greater availability, diversity, and disposable income. Rural areas show more limited discretionary spending opportunities, reflecting economic and infrastructural disparities across the region.

But as an overview, are Gay Economics Changing? – Yes, they are, the pressure from President Trump on organisations is seeing a comprehensive change in spending from business and government, and this will change the spending habits of the LGBTQI+ community.

Links

  • Belfast Pride and Economics
  • The Pink Pound’s Hidden History
  • Pink money
  • Homo Economics
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: 2025, Belfast, consumer behaviour, economic trends, gbp, inclusion, LGBTQ, lgbtq spending, Northern Ireland, pink pound, rural vs urban, uk economy

Canberra Teen’s Viral TikTok About Being the Token Gay Becomes His Biggest Hit

05/10/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Canberra Teen - Jett BlytonJett Blyton’s song about being the token gay goes viral

By ACOMSDave / October 5, 2025

Share this post

Canberra’s Jett Blyton didn’t plan to release Apeshit—until 2.5 million people decided otherwise.

“If you said a month ago I’d be releasing a song called Apeshit this year, I wouldn’t have believed you. It didn’t exist yet,” Blyton said.

At the end of July, the Australian alt-pop artist performed the track once on TikTok.

The song exploded.

Over 2.5 million views on TikTok and 300,000+ on Instagram, inspiring 100+ user-generated videos.

With that viral spotlight, Jett had no choice but to officially release it.

‘The only gay dude in a room full of straight guys’

“I wrote this song about being the only gay dude in a room full of straight guys and how tokenistic it can feel,” Blyton explained.

“The fact it resonated with over 2.5 million people now is so insane.”

The Canberra teen has been making waves—featured in Triple J Unearthed High Yearbook for 2023 and 2024, and nominated for Music ACT Music Awards (MAMAs).

His wonky, zany sound is attention-grabbing.

So good for him for capitalising on this moment.

“I took the song to my friend Thomas Porter and said, ‘let’s get this out ASAP,'” Blyton said.

“With some final touches from Aleksiah and Harry O’Brien (from Pacific Avenue), this is my favourite song I’ve ever put out.”

‘Everybody here used to bully me’

Apeshit opens with a girl calling Jett: “I know you said you didn’t wanna come out tonight, but my boyfriend’s thing is on, and I literally don’t know, like, anyone else going.”

Jett sings: “I don’t wanna drink, but there isn’t a choice, they’re dapping me up like I’m one of the boys. And everybody here used to bully me in 8th grade.”

The track captures that universal feeling of being alone in a crowd—drinking through discomfort and struggling with feelings nobody else in the room understands.

The official version brings Jett’s unapologetic honesty to the forefront with electronic alt-pop energy.

Following his recent single Needingabreak, his most supported track on Australian radio, Jett’s earned shoutouts from Sabrina Carpenter and Tove Lo.

His Double Vision (Vol. 2) EP drops in November.

You can listen to Apeshit now.

For more LGBTQ+ music and community stories, visit ACOMSDave.com.

Links:

  • Jett Blyton’s song about being the token gay goes viral
  • X-Men star opens up about first on-screen gay kiss in music video

 

Filed Under: Music Reviews Tagged With: alt-pop, Apeshit song, Australian music, Australian queer artists, Canberra musician, coming out stories, gay artist, indie pop, Jett Blyton, LGBTQ community, LGBTQ music, queer anthem, queer representation, queer TikTok, TikTok viral song, token gay, tokenism, Triple J Unearthed, viral music 2025, viral TikTok music

The Wolfenden Report: A Turning Point for Gay Rights

05/10/2025 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Wolfenden ReportWolfenden Report

When the Wolfenden Report was published on 4 September 1957, its dry, academic 155 pages sparked an unexpected firestorm. The first print run of 5,000 copies sold out within hours, and Sir John Wolfenden found himself cursed by religious groups and confronting graffiti outside his home.

A Response to Government Discomfort

Home Secretary Sir David Maxwell Fyfe had commissioned the committee to address two issues troubling the government: the visibility of sex workers on London’s streets and the rising arrests of gay men. Ironically, this increase stemmed from Maxwell Fyfe’s own policy of deliberate police entrapment of homosexual men.

The crackdown had ensnared high-profile figures including codebreaker Alan Turing, actor Sir John Gielgud, and Lord Montagu of Beaulieu. These prosecutions embarrassed the establishment and generated extensive press coverage—exactly what the government hoped to avoid.

“You knew what could happen,” recalled Rex Batten, a gay man living in London at the time. “You knew the cases that had come up, the people who were in jail for a year, two years, three years.”

Groundbreaking Yet Flawed Recommendations

After three years of testimony from police, psychiatrists, religious leaders, and some affected gay men, the committee recommended that consensual homosexual acts between men over 21 in private should no longer be criminal. The report’s philosophy was clear: “We’re concerned primarily with public order and not with private morality,” Sir John told the BBC.

However, the recommendations weren’t pioneering—many European countries, including France, Italy, and the Netherlands, had already decriminalized homosexuality. The report also contradicted itself by condemning homosexuality as “immoral” and “psychologically destructive” while rejecting the idea that it was a mental illness.

Harsh Treatment of Sex Workers

The report’s stance on prostitution was far more punitive. Rather than decriminalisation, it recommended harsher penalties, including three months’ imprisonment for third offences. Sir John justified this by wanting to avoid making detours when walking with his teenage daughter through certain London streets. Notably, the committee never consulted any sex workers.

Public Backlash and Eventual Success

The report faced fierce opposition. The Daily Mail warned that “great nations have fallen and empires decayed because corruption became socially acceptable.” Even Maxwell Fyfe rejected the homosexuality recommendations, though the government quickly adopted the prostitution measures in the 1959 Street Offences Act.

Despite resistance, the report sparked a crucial public debate. The Homosexual Law Reform Society was formed in 1958 to campaign for change. A decade later, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act finally decriminalised consensual homosexual acts in England and Wales, though it took until 1980 for Scotland and 1982 for Northern Ireland to follow.

Legacy

While deeply flawed, the Wolfenden Report opened a conversation about equal rights and the state’s role in private behaviour. As Rex Batten reflected: “We just wanted to be left alone to live our lives.” That simple wish, eventually granted, remains the report’s most important legacy.

 

Links:

  • ‘It provoked a fierce public debate’: The 1957 homosexuality report that divided the UK
  • Beyond The Law by Charles Upchurch – Gay Book Review

Filed Under: Editor to ACOMSDave Tagged With: 1950s Britain, 1967 Sexual Offences Act, Alan Turing, British legal history, gay rights movement, gay rights UK, homosexual law reform, homosexuality decriminalization, LGBTQ legislation, LGBTQ+ History, Maxwell Fyfe, prostitution laws, queer history, sex work laws, sexual offences law, Sir John Wolfenden, social justice history, Street Offences Act 1959, UK civil rights, Wolfenden Report

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2

Categories

Copyright ACOMSDave.com © 2026