ACOMSDave

Community Journalist

  • Home
  • Community Journalist
  • Events
  • Media Page and Press Kit
    • Projects and Work
  • Resources & Documents
    • LGBTQ+ Support Groups and Documents
  • NIGRA
  • Archives
  • Contact

A Few Good Men: An Oral History of Early Gay Porn

12/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

OUT dot com logo

BY MIKE STABILE
JULY 08 2015 11:00 AM EDT
seed-money-bulge-750x563

A documentary about Chuck Holmes, who founded Falcon Studios, uncovers the risks (and adventures) of making sexy films for a gay audience.

 
Few men have had as much an effect on gay culture as Vaughn Kincey, Jack Dufault, Jim Hodges, and Chuck Holmes. In the late 1960s and early 70s, they — under the pseudonyms John Summers, Matt Sterling, John Travis, and Bill Clayton — helped pioneer what would become the gay pornography industry. Gay films made by gay men for a gay audience. Driven by the exuberance of gay liberation and profit, they delivered to millions of gay men the first vision of what an out, unashamed gay life might look like.
But 40 years later, they and the risks they took are still largely unknown and unacknowledged.  While working on Seed Money, a documentary about Chuck Holmes — who founded Falcon Studios, and went on to become the most commercially successful of the four — I kept coming back to the risks and adventure of those first years post-Stonewall. Some of these stories made it into the film, which screens this summer at dozens of festivals, including Outfest in Los Angeles on July 13. But some of the best did not. Here, in the words of those who were there is how it all began.
(Interviews have been condensed and edited for clarity.)
VAUGHN KINCEY (“John Summers”, co-founder Falcon Studios): It was just a very small group of us when we started.  It wasn’t that many.  At first, it started off me and John Travis.  We were just shooting pictures and running whorehouses.  And then next came Matt Sterling, which was Jack Dufault.  And then came Chuck [Holmes].
I was working on Sutter Street at an art gallery. I was a curator,  and every lunch time we’d go to Union Square to eat lunch and shop at I. Magnin’s, and you know — sissy shit. This one guy was a school teacher and I think he was holding up stores — you know, he had a gun and he was holding up stores convenience stores to raise money. He told me this story about a place on Castro Street that was a place of frequency: a whorehouse. And mmmmmm… I was interested.
So he took me over. The place was just dark and dingy. And the sissies were flying around there like birds and I thought — My God! Who would want to buy one of these fucking sissies? So we talked and said why don’t we come partners — I can bring in art and sheets and beautiful towels… Two months later we opened our place.
I met Bob Damron [of the Damron Gay Travel Guide].  He used to shoot boys, some of the guys in my business, to put into his catalog.  J. Brian was the one that was the architect of it.  It was calledGolden Boys.
JIM HODGES (“John Travis,” co-founder Falcon Studios): I was probably one of the first in the business.  Bob Mizer [publisher of  [of Physique Pictorial] was down here on West 11th Street in Los Angeles.  We were shooting posing straps. And then it went from posing straps to ‘soft’ nudes [with flaccid penises]. And then it went from ‘soft’ nudes to piano wire holding the penis back —  but hard so it would stay down, not go up.  It was a lot of magazine publishing back then.  That is really where it all started.
JOHN WATERS (“Pope of Trash,” director Pink Flamingos): When I was young there was no legal hardcore porn. What was thought of as porn back then was pin-up magazines like Vim and Vigor and all those Bruce of [LA]. And I used to shoplift them because I was too afraid of buying them. If you call that porn, that was the first porn I saw. I read Candy and Lady Chatterly’s Lover and Henry Miller and I went to all the nudist camp and exploitation movies right up to when hardcore finally became legal.
VAUGHN KINCEY: Before you couldn’t actually see a penis, you couldn’t actually see it. There were about three guys that were shooting what they called beefcake. They started shooting boys with no clothes on and oh — the books were selling like you wouldn’t believe.
They fired J. Brian and brought Jim Hodges in, which is John Travis.  So they introduced me to Jim and we just were friends right away.  He spent most of his time at one of my houses and actually almost moved in.  I don’t think he went home but once or twice a month.  He just stayed there all the time.
J. Brian opened up another company called J. Brian Enterprises over on Folsom Street.  He kept wanting to make a movie like a romantic love story but with two guys.  He kept wanting to do it. So the Dean of the University of Oregon gave us the money to do it, and they were shooting — John Travis was running the camera. They were shooting and shooting and shooting. Pretty soon, they had spent up that $20,000 dollars, and [J. Brian] would get drunk every night.
In between shots at the evening, Jim would shoot a little hardcore.  We didn’t know it was hardcore at that time.  He just shot a couple of guys kissing and actually have sex, but the movie that J. Brian was making was not sex. It was just beautiful guys running around half naked. But this was hard sex.  And Jim had shot three or four scenes.
When J. Brian found out what he had shot, they got into a fistfight. Like two bitches going at each other. I had to break them up. So we had to take the film away from J. Brian and have it edited because the guy had a lot of money [invested] in it.
JIM HODGES: I was traveling the country, checking into hotels, meeting interested customers that were interested in buying [hardcore] films.  And I had what you call a demo, an 8mm film that I would run.  It would take about twenty minutes.  It would show four or five short subjects on eight or nine films I had available and they would buy them while they were there.  And then we would talk and chit chat.  And in one of my encounters back at Cincinnati, Ohio, I met Chuck.  And we chit-chatted and talked.  He said, “Oh, I want to get into the business!  Oh, I would love to get into that business!”  I said, “No, I don´t think you really want to deal with the Feds and Postal Inspectors and all the other shit involved.”  “Oh, I want to get into that business and I want to make movies.”  Blah, blah, blah, blah.  Six or seven months later he moved out to San Francisco.
STEVEN SCARBOROUGH (director Falcon Studios, founder Hot House Entertainment): It was extremely closeted. As [Chuck] told it, he had some friends who were in it — I think he means Hodges and Vaughn… And he said: “Oh, I’m smarter than those guys are, and they seem to be making a good living so I know I can do it.” So, evidently, he borrowed $5,000 dollars from someone and that was how he started Falcon.
JEFF STRYKER (porn star): Chuck was the business brain behind everything.  He was the financial whiz.  John Travis was the cameraman. He was the creative aspect of everything. He was the original pioneer. But Chuck knew how to capitalize off this. He was very, very good with money.  So when they got together, it was Travis shooting them and Chuck marketing them and taking it from there. But in the beginning, it was a two man operation. Vaughn Kincey came in because he would sell them the mailing list that he got from this company, that company and the other.
VAUGHN KINCEY: I don’t even remember what we discussed.  It was so unprofessional.  It was like someone says “Hey, let’s do this.”  I said I’m going to set you up, give you all the contacts. I want $5,000 and a little percentage of whatever.  And we just started doing it.  It just blossomed.  You know sex sells.  It just blossomed overnight.
MARTY ROSENTHAL (Le Salon bookstore, San Francisco): When I first got into the industry, they were selling anything at all.  The 15 minute loops, those 8mm loops, were so poorly lit and people’s body hair was not manicured.  Their hair didn’t matter.  Dirty feet.  This was straight and gay porn.  It didn’t matter because it was sex, but sometimes you could hardly even what was going on.
As the industry matured, it became very professional and well-lit, extreme close-ups, beautiful models.  I think Chuck was a major part in getting the industry to that point.
sage_cover
 
While sex had been filmed since the invention of the camera, the sale or exhibition of  “porn” — actual sex on film — was illegal. In 1969, San Francisco had became the first city in the US to allow porn to screen in theaters, and the business flourished, leading the New York Times to proclaim it the “Smut Capital of the United States” in 1970. Demand for hardcore product increased nationally, with most of it coming out of San Francisco.
HABIB CAROUBA (owner, Market Street Cinema, San Francisco): On film we just kept pushing the envelope. Whatever you could do. Like, you could show a dick but you can’t show a hard dick — so one time you show him half-hard. But in the old days, with the gay films, we could show anything you want because the cops didn’t want to go [in]. And if you had a gay cop, then he liked it — so he didn’t bust it.
PHIL ST. JOHN (performer and director): San Francisco was wild when I got there in ’71. We went to San Francisco because we had had with the rest of America. We wanted to be free.  We wanted to have sex.  We wanted to be gay. We wanted to be queer, and we wanted to take a lot of drugs and party and listen to really good music… And porn was part of that. Porn is freedom.
I just started going back to school and one day I was walking on Market Street. and some woman came up to me and she said “Do you want to be in a porn movie?”
And I said “A gay porn movie?”  And she said “Yeah, yeah, gay, gay.”  I said okay.  And I was in film school so I thought I kind of owe it to myself to see what it’s like on the other side of the camera. And much to my embarrassment, there was a guy right from film class, one of my straight buddies from film school, who was the cameraman.
He had the lens shoved up right on my ass with me getting fucked on camera. It was wild.
VAUGHN KINCEY: We weren’t making films so that people would say they are having good sex or they are showing how sex should be done. We were making them because we enjoyed it.  We loved it, and that’s what we liked doing.
JOHN KARR (journalist, The Bay Area Reporter): They were very post-Stonewall. They were reflecting new gay freedoms. The ability to have sex — which had been clandestine and furtive. The explosion of gay men’s visibility: on the streets, in the world, in bars that no longer had their windows painted black and the movies quickly reflected this. It was an incredible explosion. How quickly the sense of freedom replaced The Boys in the Band era.=
PHIL ST. JOHN: I was living in the Castro and I had heard about this movie theater downtown. And they said: “It’s a mainstream movie but don’t be put off by that, there is like the wildest sex that you ever saw in your life going on there.” So I went to find it and I didn’t think it was as big as it was.  It was a huge theater. I mean it held maybe six, seven hundred people on the main floor but then the balcony maybe was twice the size.  I mean it was huge, and the bathrooms were wild, too.
There were soldiers. There were sailors. There were like leather guys. There were cowboys. There were even a few drag queens working the bathroom. I mean it was a really wild place.
It took me a while to find the balcony, but once I did, I never left. God, I spent like all my off days from film school in the balcony at the Strand theater.  And it was great!
JOHN KARR: There were double bills that changed every other week. It cost $5 dollars to get in — that was expensive for me to have discretionary income. But I couldn’t deny I wasn’t in the theater every other week when a new movie opened.
Over on Polk Street at California, there was the Laurel Theater. I’m in there watching a movie one evening — and the police arrive. And people were shivering and shaking and crying. And I said, “They just want us to leave. Just leave.”  I don’t know what was really going on, but they were hassling the business.
TED SAWICKI (cameraman and editor, Delta Productions): You have to understand it’s before video and basically the dark ages. No one had ever done this before.
You are going to look at the history. There’s some nudity and some running around, and then it’s going to go to kissing.  And it’s going to go to some full frontal — shocking!  But as far as hard core sex coming on the scene, creeping in ’68, ’69, ’70, ’71, ’71, it had gotten hard core.  Still very illegal.  It was interstate transportation of pornography. It was a felony — and it’s equivalent to smuggling cocaine.
STEVEN SCARBOROUGH: They all hid. They all had noms de porn. At the first hint of a bust they’d all pick up their teepees and run.
There was a motel down there on Sunset [Blvd in Los Angeles], The Saharan, that they all used to shoot in.  And there are stories about the FBI sitting out there in their sunglasses at the swimming pool and watching and shit like that!  One time they had to get the tapes out, they couldn’t get the tapes out of the room — the FBI was downstairs.  So Vaughn tied a towel on his head and got the laundry basket and went up there like the maid, and put the freaking tapes in the laundry basket and went like this, rode out past the FBI.
VAUGHN KINCEY: You had to be very careful.  No one knew where they were going to shoot that day until they were going there. It was a secret. It was terrible. It was like the McCarthy Era for making sex films.
MARTY ROSENTHAL: You weren’t supposed to ship obscene materials across state lines. There were certain areas of the country where we knew we were not supposed to ship anything into. Any porn into certain parts of the South, like Atlanta or Florida. It depended on community standards.
STEVEN SCARBOROUGH: [Chuck] was indicted along with Matt Sterling. The trial was actually in Texas. I think it was a mail order sting.
They showed an interracial scene in the courtroom and one of the prosecutors said “Ladies and Gentleman of the jury — this could be your son!” and one of the women in the jury box threw up. And they went to the judge in chambers and said “Judge we don’t feel like we’re getting a fair trial.” And the judge said “Fair trial? Fair trial? Hell, not too many years ago we’d have taken those old boys out behind the courthouse and hung ’em!” That was what the legal climate was like.
Chuck delayed it. And eventually had it moved to San Francisco. But Matt Sterling wouldn’t spend the money and ended up going to prison [for three years].
JIM HODGES  I decided to discontinue shooting for myself because I just didn’t want to deal with the entanglement of the Feds and postal inspectors, all that shit.  So I let Chuck take the brunt.
The arrest and prosecutions would continue, but by the mid-1970s, there was no real way to put the genie back in the bottle — demand was too great, and the monetary reward matched the risk.  What had started as a handful of men in San Francisco filming sex had grown into a massive industry and Chuck Holmes, as the founder of Falcon Studio, had become its godfather.
Seed Money: The Chuck Holmes Story, screens at Outfest in Los Angeles on July 13th, and across the country this summer and fall. For a list of upcoming screenings (more to come)  visit the Seed Money official site.
al-parker-weekend-lockup-x750

Filed Under: Movie Reviews Tagged With: Chuck Holmes Story, gay porn, lgbt history, porn history

The 4Cs Model of Effective Communication – part 3

12/07/2015 By ACOMSDave

The Second C is ‘Connection’.

Connection with an idea

 

Making connections is what we all strive to do daily, whether it is with our partner, our children, or with our extended family; but then we move out into the ‘big’ world and here we seem to forget the rules we have used at home, and seem to think that they are put together differently for the ‘real’ world of business.

They are not!

Making a connection with a communicated idea or message  means not only that the audience (the people who you have written for, or who you have made that telephone call to; or even just stopped and had a conversation with)  get it, but that it resonates with them.  It strikes a chord.  It has, somehow, become part of their being.

Messages and ideas, in whatever form presented, that make connections are on their way to truly meaning something which is intrinsic to the your audience; and more importantly it will lead to new behaviours and actions.

I never dreamed about success

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: 4Cs, connection, ideas

Coming Out Cards

11/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

‘Coming Out Cards’ Provide The Perfect Response For A Newly Out Loved One

The Huffington Post  |  By JamesMichael Nichols
Posted: 07/09/2015 2:00 pm EDT
Coming out is never easy.
However, for individuals who have never loved or been close to a member of the lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) community, knowing how to respond to someone’s coming out can also be challenging.
For this reason, queer teen John Hansen began making “Coming Out Cards” — free eCards that can be sent to a newly out member of the LGBT community as a small gesture of support and compassion. The cards are often tongue-in-cheek, adding a lighthearted air to what can be one of the most difficult times of a queer person’s life.
“Coming out is often isolating, and continuing a dialogue with someone who has recently come out can make them feel much more comfortable and confident,” Hansen told The Huffington Post. “It can make such a huge difference to remind them that you’re listening, that you understand and that you’re there for them. I hope these eCards will do exactly that.”
The Huffington Post chatted further with Hansen this week about the “Coming Out Cards” and the impact he hopes they achieve. Check out the interview, as well as the cards themselves, below.
Coming Out-2Coming OUt-1

Why did you decide to create these “Coming Out Cards”?
John Hansen: For a while now, I’ve noticed that there are greeting cards for almost every occasion, yet very few geared specifically towards coming out. And so, about a month ago, I decided to change that. Because I’m not much of a designer, a big part of the eCards for me has always been the message — I wanted the cards to feel fun and positive and conversational all at once, so that they’d read like a friend’s dorky text.
Why do you think this resource is so important for the queer community?
The eCards certainly won’t change everything — one of the many pressing issues facing the queer community is acceptance, and it’s brave LGBTQIA+ people across the world who are fighting to make acceptance the norm. But my hope is that these cards will help in that “after coming out” stage, both by putting a smile on a queer person’s face and by letting them breathe deeply because they know they truly are supported.
Coming Out-5Coming Out-4Coming Out-3
In your opinion, why are affirmations of support crucial to the healthy lives of queer people?
Though not every queer person will need an affirmation of support, I do think that — especially in the beginning stages of the process — many people are still deeply uncertain about how their sexuality or gender will affect their relationships, and little affirmations of support can help remind them that it’s going to be okay. Coming out is often isolating, and continuing a dialogue with someone who has recently come out can make them feel much more comfortable and confident. You honestly don’t know what’s going through their mind — they might still be insecure about their sexuality or gender, for example, or they might have had bad coming out experiences in the past and are worried that this one will also turn sour. It can make such a huge difference to remind them that you’re listening, that you understand and that you’re there for them. I hope these eCards will do exactly that.
What do you hope to see from this project in the future?
I’d really love for the cards to reach the right people — by which I mean queer people who might find them funny, yeah, but also others who are supportive of the LGBTQIA+ community but who aren’t quite sure how to express it. I hope these cards will bridge the gap for anyone who is struggling to convey their admiration for a loved one who has recently come out.
Want to see more “Coming Out Cards”? Head here.

Let Us KnowEditorial:  Do you think you would ever use a Coming Out Card?  Have you already used a Coming Out Card?  Write and let us know.

Some Celebrities Who Have Come Out As LGBT

Matt Bomer 2012Gillian Anderson 2012Jodie Foster 2013Wentworth MIller 2013
 

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia Tagged With: coming out, Coming Out Cards, equality, Gillian Anderson, Jodie Foster, Matt Bomer, Wentworth Miller

LGBT Groups Welcome Employment Protection For Gay Teachers

11/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

outmost_logo

The Government yesterday passed through a report stage bill that will amend Section 37.1 of the Employment Equality Act.

The amendment will allow employees working in religious run organisations, such as schools and hospitals, to be open about their sexuality without fear of dismissal.
INTO LGBT Teachers’ Group welcome the amendment, saying that the change will have a hugely positive effect on teachers.

Speaking outside the Seanad, Chairperson of the INTO LGBT Teachers’ Group Anne Marie Lillis commented, “LGB teachers can be secure in the knowledge that speaking about our families and our relationships, in the same way as our colleagues and that being gay or lesbian will have no bearing on job security or on prospects for promotion. When signed into law this legislation will end the threat of discrimination in primary schools based on sexual orientation.”

Sheila Nunan General Secretary of the INTO added, “The INTO has always advocated for the equal treatment of our members and to remove the weight of discrimination being felt on the grounds of sexual orientation. These amendments will further that aim and ensure that the lives of our teaching colleagues significantly improve. It is a victory for all teachers in our classrooms throughout the country. This is the culmination of the hard work our members of the LGBT Teachers’ Group have done over many years”.

The Bill has to still pass the final stage before being introduced into law. The INTO LGBT Teachers’ Group acknowledged the work of Senator Ivana Bacik, Minister Aodhán O Ríordáin, Senator Averil Power and Senator Katherine Zappone who worked in progressing the Bill.

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia Tagged With: Employment Law, equality, Gay Teachers, Irish politics

Boulevard

11/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

‘Boulevard’ Star Roberto Aguire On Working With Robin Williams In Last Dramatic Role

 

“The great thing about Robin is, after you had the chance to meet him, that’s exactly who he was.”

 
Carolina MorenoEditor, The Huffington Post
Roberto Aquire and Robbie Williams
It can be a long road to acceptance, particularly when it comes to who you are.
That sentiment is what drives Robin Williams’ character Nolan Mack in the Dito Montiel-directed indie film “Boulevard.” The 60-year-old bank officer has led a lonely life despite his long childless marriage to his wife Joy (Kathy Baker). The couple lack intimacy, not for a lack of love but because Nolan is gay — a fact he has spent most of his life repressing.  
Mexican-American actor Roberto Aguire comes in as Leo, a hustler whom Nolan pays for companionship, not sex, as he tries to come to term with his sexuality. The 27-year-old actor spoke to The Huffington Post ahead of the film’s nationwide release on Friday. Aguire opened up about what it was like to work with Williams in his final dramatic role and why he feels Latino actors shouldn’t be limited by the ‘Latino’ label.
 
“Boulevard” deals with Nolan trying to come to terms with his sexuality after a lifetime of suppressing it. And you portray Leo, a character that becomes a catalyst for all of this. What drew you into the script the most when you first read it? 
[Screenwriter Douglas Soesbe] has a beautifully fluid way of writing dialogue that almost sounds like poetry. So when I read the script, immediately it captured me. I thought it was a story that had to be told.
 There is so much of this topic, especially right now, that’s prevalent in America. But it’s also very hidden in America. I think if you talk to anybody they know a person or they have an uncle, a brother, a son, a cousin who is in a later stage in their life who is coming to terms with who they really are. I think that story has to be told, it has to be shown that it doesn’t matter if you get to a later stage in your life, you can always make a change. You always deserve to find happiness, so that was the second thing that drew me to the script.
 
And Leo also kind of suppresses the reality of being in the dangerous world of male prostitution.   
Leo is this beautiful character who is so complex and so complicated within this dangerous world that he lives in. I don’t think he’s a run-of-the-mill hustler [laughs], to put it that way. He kind of sticks out because he has this innate and hidden sensitivity into life, and almost like [a] childlike innocence that when you see him you just want to give him a hug, you just want to tell him that it’s going to be OK. You just want to tell him to get out of that situation.
But for some reason, he’s stuck and he can’t get out — very much like Nolan’s trapped in something that they’re just not happy with. But I think in Leo’s case it manifests itself in a physical danger and an emotional danger that he’s had to shut down in order to deal with.
 
“Boulevard” was Robin Williams’ final dramatic performance. It’s been almost a year since his death on Aug. 11, 2014. When the news broke many who only knew him through his films mourned him like the loss of a close friend. As someone who had worked closely with him relatively recently, do you recall how you felt the moment you found out?
Yeah, I was in my apartment in Los Angeles and I just remember feeling numb. I think the way you just described the general reaction to his death, which was “the mourning of a close friend,” is a testament to who he was. He had this ability to be able to touch people through every character that he did. Whether it was a dramatic role or a comedic role, after you watch[ed] one of his movies it was like you knew Robin Williams, you knew who he was.
The great thing about Robin is, after you had the chance to meet him, that’s exactly who he was. He was this kind, generous, enormous soul who loved to interact with people — be with people, to show people who he was. I think it speaks so highly of him and his humanity to see the kind of reaction that people had. Everybody around the world just united in this outpouring of love for Robin, and that’s beautiful to see. I think it’s so sad that we all lost such a genius of our time and such a humble and beautiful human being. But it’s beautiful to see how much people loved him, both the people that were close to him and the people that only knew him through his movies.
 
Robin had a very long and successful career both in comedy and drama. What was your biggest takeaway as a young actor working with such a legend?
So much. [laughs] It’s like a young writer saying, “I sat down with Ernest Hemingway and I learned one thing.” It’s like, no way. There’s so much — just to see the level of dedication was amazing. You’d think that a veteran actor working on a small independent project shooting over 22 days would maybe say, ‘you know what, I can maybe phone it in’ or ‘I can take a step back and cruise through this.’ I mean he could have easily with his talent; I think the movie would have still been great. But he showed up 120 percent in every single scene, there wasn’t a single scene that he wasn’t blowing everyone away with his performance. It didn’t matter how small the scene was or how emotionally trying the scene was.
That’s amazing for a young actor to see, that drive [and] that dedication. I think nowadays there [are] a lot of young actors who are very lazy… celebrity-dom has made them lazy because they don’t have to be much of anything to just get in front of a camera and be a personality. To create a fully formed character full of life, struggle and humanity is tough. It’s not easy, and to see someone like Robin do it so effortlessly yet so meticulously precise[ly], it’s truly inspiring.
Roberto Aquire
As a young Latino actor it can be particularly hard to get your foot into this industry. Many find great roles in indie films, like Gina Rodriguez in “Filly Brown.” Where do you hope this opportunity will take you in your career?
I hope that it just opens more doors. It’s interesting, I think as a Latino actor the biggest challenge is being called Latino because immediately the world has a perception of what that means. A Latino actor can’t play this and a Latino actor can’t play that because they’re Latino. Well, no. And I think Gina Rodriguez is a beautiful example of it. We can play anything we want to play. Just as an Aussie can play an American or a Scot can play a Frenchman or a Peruvian can play the world’s leading neurologist, I think Latinos can play anything. We can be anything that we want to be; we can be any role.
I can tell you the huge difference between a Latino and [puts on a Scottish accent] a person from Scotland is you’ll never think that person from Scotland can’t do anything. I put on a Scottish accent and people are like ‘whaaa happened?!’ But it shouldn’t be mind-blowing. Latinos can do anything. I think that’s the biggest issue we’re facing right now, it’s Latinos being labeled as Latinos and being limited by it, as opposed to being labeled as Latino and being empowered by it. I hope that “Boulevard” is able to open a door for me to say, “I’m a Latino actor and I can be a chameleon, I can be anything you want me to be.”  
 This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity. 

Filed Under: Movie Reviews Tagged With: Boulevard, Robbie Williams, Roberto Aquire

The state of publishing in Britain

11/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

The Bookseller – Published July 10, 2015. By Kerry Hudson
we-need-diverse-books
 
In an extract of an article by novelist Kerry Hudson, commissioned by Writers’ Centre Norwich for The National Conversation, the Scottish author explores the state of the literary ecology
Imagine four writers. They are talented, they have written brilliant, sales-worthy books. They are respectively BAME, LGBT, working- class, disabled. They go in search of publication. Feedback comes in: “The writing is good but it didn’t speak to me. I don’t know how I’d sell this.” Of course, to love a book it must resonate, represent a society we recognise, have relatable characters. However, the agents and editors who will decide if our writers will be published may not “connect” with these stories.
In Spread the Word’s recent Writing the Future: Black and Asian Writing in the UK report, just 11% of publishers that responded had ties with non-Oxbridge universities or had developed educational programmes for state schools. Additionally, publishers are overwhelmingly London-based, with entry into the profession largely gained through unpaid internships. This is not a system which fosters diversity.
Three of our authors gain representation, but not the BAME writer who—like 53% of BAME writers surveyed in Writing the Future—remains unagented. While our authors sell their books there are commercial concerns: the LGBT writer is asked to “straighten” a few characters; the BAME writer’s editorial notes urge “authenticity”, by which they seem to mean more “urban/African/ethnic” . . . though the writer is sure that the semi-autobiographical novel is “authentically” about them. The disabled and working-class writers are asked to talk about difficult personal experiences during book promotion. One welcomes the opportunity, the other doesn’t wish to be defined by this single trait; publicity column inches will reflect this.
Now our writers are authors, there should be second novels. Unfortunately, our BAME author remains unagentedDiverse Voices and is unable to place his next novel. Our disabled writer suffered from her lack of press coverage. The working-class writer couldn’t sustain the added unpredictability of a tiny income and took a “real” job. The LGBT writer was nominated for two LGBT awards and, though the advance reduced, was able to write without concern that she might alienate the presumed “mainstream” reader.
Four writers. One stays in print. The others, their future stories, are lost. The consequence? Other emerging writers will look, and fail, to find voices like their own, and young people from non-Oxbridge institutions will have no idea that they might contribute to our literary culture. It is stories lost, voices unheard, a book-buying public that has no idea how much spectrum of choice it is being denied.
Without making changes, we risk turning our proud literary legacy into a factory producing monocultural “safe-ish bets” based on previous successes, where books are viewed as “units” to be shifted. Naturally so, this is a business. The bottom line is important.
So consider an industry that could benefit from the potential disposable income of £300bn for the BAME community and approximately £80bn for both the Pink Pound and those with disabilities. Even as we publish more books than ever in the UK, and our market becomes saturated, the fact that we have a such a spectrum of diversity in this country should make our potential to perform well in the area of foreign rights much stronger, because a variety of books about people of different backgrounds will be more attractive globally.
Books are not just a business, they are a fundamental element of evolved society. Writers are often the first to be persecuted by oppressive regimes specifically because words have immense power to influence. We must not relinquish that power by reducing it merely to profit and loss calculations. Let’s make sure a career in publishing is seen as a viable option for people of all backgrounds. If we portray the true multiplicity of society in books, young people will grow up immersed in a British cultural life which fosters a creative environment with inclusivity, innovation and collaboration at its heart. Let’s harness the enormous potential of our diversity, not only to meet our current financial objectives but to fulfil our responsibilities for generations to come.
I don’t believe anyone in publishing is unconcerned by its lack of diversity. But agreeing isn’t enough. Each of us must ask: “What can I do to change this?”
 
Join the discussion using #NatConv or at www.writerscentrenorwich.org.uk
 

Editorial:  Previously I have written about how dire the state of LGBT publishing is in the UK, indeed I cannot find any details currently of books that are written by LGBT authors, or for LGBT readers in the UK.  An article published in September 2011 on the Malinda Lo – I have the numbers! site gives us some statistics for the period 1969-2011 which makes interesting reading. Please have a look at it, but I am quickly going to produce some of the statistics in picture form here:

 
lgbtyawhopublishes1 lgbtya2000-11publisher1 lgbtya1969-2011a

Filed Under: Book Reviews Tagged With: diversity, LGBT publishing, UK publishers

How the internet is helping homeless LGBT youth

10/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

LGBT Youth-1
 
A new video, created by Vocativ, shows the impact that the internet can have in helping LGBT young people who have been made homeless in the US.
The short video highlights the stories of a number of residents at the Lost-N-Found shelter in Atlanta, Georgia.
 
LGBT Youth-SpencerOne of the residents – Matthew – speaks of being thrown out of his home by his preacher father, while trans man Spencer was also ostracised by his religious family.
Matthew recounts how helpful the internet was in helping him find somewhere to go: “I was able to get online and just find… That one chance, that one opportunity. My phone really saved my life.”
The shelter was opened in 2011 by Rick Westbrook, who says that: “social media is wonderful” for those who find themselves without a home.
However, Westbrook also notes the dangers of the internet for vulnerable LGBT youth: “[social media] is also a gateway for a lot of the people that prey on our youth. We have a lot of creeps out there.”
Watch the video below:
 

Further information about Lost-N-Found can be found here.
Words Ross Semple, @rosssemple
Images Voactiv

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia Tagged With: Gay Times, LGBT youth, LGBT Youth and the Internet, Lost-N-Found

100 years on, we can still honour Casement’s wish

10/07/2015 By ACOMSDave 1 Comment

Martina Devlin

Irish Independent 

9 July 2015

Portrait of Irish patriot, Sir Roger Casement, 1864-1916. GettyJuly 1916. The days were ticking closer to Roger Casement’s execution on a charge of high treason. By now, he was publicly vilified in Britain not just as a revolutionary but as a homosexual, stripped of the knighthood he had earned as a human rights campaigner.

In his cell, his thoughts turned to the haunting majesty of the Glens of Antrim, scene of his boyhood, and he expressed a longing to be buried there.

That desire remains unfulfilled. As commemorations to mark the Easter Rising’s centenary begin on August 1 with a year-long series of events, it’s appropriate to re-open the matter of Casement’s dying wish. Now is the time to make a respectful request on his behalf to the Belfast and London governments.
Let me take you back to those final days in London’s Pentonville Prison. His appeal against conviction was rejected on July 18, and he began writing farewell letters. One of the most poignant went to his cousin, Elizabeth Bannister. “Don’t let my body lie here – get me back to the green hill by Murlough – by the McGarry’s (sic) house looking down on the Moyle – that’s where I’d like to be now and that’s where I’d like to lie.”
Paper was scarce for condemned prisoners, and his writing became progressively smaller as he tried to cram in everything he wanted to say. “God bless you and keep you my dearest, dearest one. You and G. (Gertude, another cousin) have been the best things in my life these awful days… And so au revoir.” He signed it Roddie.
The letter is dated July 25, 1916. Nine days later he was hanged.
His request was ignored. Instead, his body was buried in an unmarked grave in the prison yard. It was treated with contempt, thrown naked into an open grave without a coffin, and covered with quicklime. The quicklime was standard but the rest was not common practice, and showed how he was viewed by the British authorities in whose eyes the former diplomat had betrayed class and country.
Yesterday, I walked by the house where Casement was born in the Dublin suburb of Sandycove, a few minutes from where I live. I pass there regularly, always turning my thoughts towards this cultivated individual whose privileges did not blind him to the human rights abuses heaped on the voiceless and powerless.
He was a combination of North and South, raised by relatives in the Ballymena area after his parents’ death. How fitting it would be now for North and South to join together in a spirit of friendship, showing respect for a public-spirited countryman who campaigned with compassion and conviction against slavery in the Congo and Peru.
Ultimately, Britain treated his remains with respect. But still his bones lie other than where he asked. In 1965, following decades of petitioning, Casement’s grave was opened and he was removed from under the skeletons of two hanged murderers.
Ireland received his body but with conditions attached: he could not be buried north of the border in case either loyalist or nationalist sentiments were stirred. And so today he rests in the Republican plot in Dublin’s Glasnevin.
Surely, after so long, people can be encouraged to see Casement in his totality. A British consul by profession, he became an anti-imperialist, but above all else he was a humanitarian.
He considered Antrim to be his home, and memories of Murlough Bay – an area of outstanding beauty with views across to the Mull of Kintyre – appear to have afforded him some respite as his death approached.
It is a matter for regret that almost a century after he was executed, there is no prospect of his wishes being honoured. Perhaps some might contend that his bones have been disturbed enough. In which case, I suggest a memorial in Murlough Bay.
It could symbolise the reconciliation between North and South after too many decades of mutual misunderstanding.
The McCarry family mentioned in that letter, with a minor misspelling of their name, erected a stone Celtic cross to pay tribute to him in 1928. Sadly, it was vandalised repeatedly by sectarian groups and was finally blown up. But must extremist views hold sway?
Casement represents a number of the multiple strands entwined through this island’s shared history: son of a Northern military father and Southern mother; born Anglican and a convert to Catholicism immediately before facing the hangman; a British Consul knighted for his services to the Crown who became a 1916 revolutionary.
In those July days 99 years ago, supporters lobbied for his sentence to be commuted, even as Casement’s private diaries describing homosexual encounters were circulated – a cynical move to undermine calls for clemency. Arthur Conan Doyle, WB Yeats, George Bernard Shaw and the US Senate made representations on his behalf. It did not change the outcome.
And what difference, you may wonder, would heeding his dying wish make after so much time has elapsed? Quite simply, it’s the right thing to do. It attaches value to his humanitarian record, which stands apart from his republican aims.
Despite the pomp and ceremony of his state funeral, with throngs filing past his coffin and an oration from President Eamon de Valera, what Casement longed for was simpler.
As he finalised his affairs, the remote beauty of the Antrim coast he knew as a boy called to him. He called to it in return – must that cry continue to go unheeded?

Irish Independent

 

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia, History Tagged With: Irish History, Irish politics, lgbt history, roger casement

Barely Methodical Troupe’s macho circus show is much fun

10/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Editorial:  This troupe was spotted by our roving reported in London, Sean McGouran, and we all know how discerning he can be.  If you see them in a theatre near you, then he heartily recommends that you go and see them.

 

Barely Methodical Troupe's Bromance-2

Barely Methodical Troupe’s Bromance-2


 

Jay Z and Kanye West; Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart; Owen Wilson and Ben Stiller: a bromance can be a beautiful thing. And it’s most definitely working for new circus trio Barely Methodical Troupe who, in their first show, take platonic man love to a new acrobatic level.
But does three make a crowd? The company riff on that possibility in this high-fun, low-key piece, which mixes goofy clowning and pared-back-but-astonishing circus skills. Each performer has their own quirky characters: there’s the big, muscleman (Louis Gift); the small cheeky one (Beren D’Amico); and the hopefull odd-one-out (Charlie Wheeller). Over the hour-long ‘Bromance’ we see them vying for each other’s (and our) attention by stupid dancing, kooky double takes and shows of impressive (and sometimes deliberately much less impressive) machismo.
Within all that are some smooth, startling sequences of pure acrobatics which mix free-running, pure contemporary dance and lots of lifts, throws and balancing acts set to music. Wheeller swoops on the cyr wheel – a huge hoop that he stands within and swings around the stage – D’Amico and Gift perform some gobsmackingly low and stomach-churningly high throws. They work hand-to-hand, body to body twisting and turning with grace, agility and much humour.
Recent graduates from The Circus Space in Hoxton, Barely Methodical’s acrobatic skills are clearly strong. But it’s the whole package – the down-to-earth performance style and the peacock prancing – that make ‘Bromance’ one of the most charming circus shows. They are the stupid but sweet guys you knew at school, boys just mucking about, men behaving badly, except here they are genuinely entertaining. Jay Z and Kanye’s love-in may be cute, but Barely Methodical Troupe’s ‘Bromance’ is where the buddy action is really at.

BY: DAISY BOWIE-SELL

POSTED: FRIDAY JUNE 26 2015

 

Venue name: Udderbelly
Contact:
VISIT WEBSITE CALL VENUE
Address: Jubilee Gardens
off Belvedere Rd
London
SE1 8XX
Transport: Tube: Waterloo
Price: £15.50-£17.50, £14-£16 concs
Barely Methodical Troupe's Bromance-1

Barely Methodical Troupe’s Bromance-1

Filed Under: Theatre Reviews Tagged With: Barely Methodical Troupe, Circus, Macho

Sainsbury’s Cover-up

10/07/2015 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

Sainsbury’s criticised for placing ‘modesty cover’ over gay lifestyle magazine but not FHM

Siam Goorwich for Metro.co.ukThursday 9 Jul 2015 12:32 pm
Sainsbury Cover-up
Sainsbury’s have been criticised for placing a copy of gay lifestyle magazine Attitude magazine behind a modesty cover, whilst making no effort to conceal FHM.
This apparent bias was highlighted when twitter user Jon Rowles tweeted a picture of the magazine rack in Sainsbury’s Mid City Place branch in Holborn, London, along with the comment, ‘Why I don’t shop @sainsburys anymore. Naked women OK but @AttitudeMag Pride Hero’s cover indecent.’
Furthermore, whilst the FHM cover in question features a bikini-clad woman, everyone on the cover of August’s Attitude magazine (which happens to be their Pride Heroes edition) is fully clothed.
attitude_mag_cover
 
 
Talking to Pink News, Mr Rowles explained: ‘What struck me was how it made the publication look seedy and somehow shameful, like I had walked into a timewarp and gone back to the early 1990s.’
Metro.co.uk contacted Sainsbury’s for a comment, and a spokesperson told us: ‘We have previously contacted the distributor of Attitude magazine with a view to remove the modesty cover on this title. The distributor agreed that whilst the cover of this magazine is now generally suitable for display, there could be future issues where it may not be. This is something we regularly review along with taking guidance from the Professional Publishers Association.’
They also explained that on this occasion FHM has been placed on a lower shelf by mistake, and that it should be displayed further back where the cover is less visible
Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2015/07/09/sainsburys-criticised-for-placing-modesty-cover-over-gay-lifestyle-magazine-but-not-fhm-5287613/#ixzz3fTYAweXm

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia Tagged With: Attitude, FHM, Gay Magazines, Modesty Cover, Sainsbury's

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • …
  • 108
  • Next Page »

Categories

Copyright ACOMSDave.com © 2026