17 is a short film linked above that follows a 17-year-old boy who moves through the world like a ghost in his own life—barely seen at school, barely understood at home, and desperate for any kind of touch that feels real. His choice to look for intimacy through a gay hookup app isn’t framed as scandalous or reckless; instead, it feels like a quiet attempt to carve out a place in a life that has given him very few.
What stands out most isn’t the encounter itself, but the emotional weather around it—the fog of loneliness, the hunger for connection, the naïve hope that someone behind a glowing screen might offer more than just a moment.
17’s energy is subdued, almost muted, and that’s where it draws both its power and its criticism. For some viewers, especially those who came of age in different decades, different towns, and under different skies, the boy’s isolation feels unfamiliar—almost alien.
Comments shared on the YouTube site paint a striking contrast.
One person remembers high-school hookups as easy, fun, and far from dangerous—daylight rendezvous in parks, coffee shops, no sneaking, no fear, and certainly no sense of doomed anonymity. Another speaks with the warmth of someone who grew up in an unexpectedly accepting 1980s southern town, surrounded by teammates who doubled as protectors, friends who doubled as lovers, and teachers who acted as quiet guardians steering them toward connection rather than harm.
Those memories swirl like bright brushstrokes beside the film’s more washed-out palette. And they illuminate something the film seems to ache with: the absence of guidance.
The boy in the story wanders alone. The men remembered in the comments never had to.
The short becomes a kind of mirror—showing not just one boy’s experience, but the widening gap between generations of queer youth: those who had safety and those who simply hope for it.
What does ’17’ capture well
-
The vulnerability of digital-first intimacy.
The app isn’t painted as a villain, but it’s no mentor either. It’s a door that opens onto anything. -
The uneasy blend of hope and risk.
Anyone who remembers their first leap into adult desire—whether in a park, a car, or behind an anonymous username—will recognise the trembling, the anticipation, the wish that this stranger might see more in you than you’ve ever been shown before. -
The quiet aftershock.
The film’s emotional landing isn’t melodrama, just the heavy blink of a boy realising that not all touches heal.
What Holds ’17’ Back
Some viewers found it forgettable—too small, too contained, too focused on the moment and not on the story around it. The boy’s inner world remains a locked box; we watch him, but we don’t fully enter his thoughts. The encounter is more event than a journey.
For those whose youth was full of connection—who knew freedom, camaraderie, even joy—the film may feel dim, almost foreign. “Where is the spark? Where is the adventure?” they ask. “Where is the pack of beautiful, outrageous friends?”
Perhaps that’s the point: not every generation gets a pack.
A Sadness That Lingers
The strongest emotional thread in the comments is grief—not just for the boy in the film, but for today’s LGBTQ+ teens who often move through adolescence feeling hunted by danger, misunderstood by family, or worn down by warnings. In some ways, this short film becomes a tiny elegy for what many young people feel they lack: guidance, community, freedom without fear.
Where earlier generations had gatekeepers who protected them, today’s young people often meet only algorithms.
The film is small, yes—but its sadness is proportionally large.
Final Thoughts
This isn’t a film about a hookup.
It’s a film about the absence of connection—the kind that makes first intimacy feel safe rather than perilous.
Whether or not it resonates depends entirely on the life you bring to it.
For some, it reflects their teenage years back at them with eerie accuracy.
For others, it will feel like a dim shadow of a youth that was thrilling, communal, and defiantly alive.
Either way, it speaks to a truth worth sitting with:
Young queer people deserve more than apps and anonymity.
They deserve mentors, circles, friendships, joy, and a world that doesn’t make connection a gamble.
And maybe, in its quiet way, the film reminds us that loneliness is not a coming-of-age requirement—it’s a societal failure that can still be undone.
Links:
Leave a Reply