ACOMSDave

Community Journalist

  • Home
  • Community Journalist
  • Events
  • Media Page and Press Kit
    • Projects and Work
  • Resources & Documents
    • LGBTQ+ Support Groups and Documents
  • NIGRA
  • Archives
  • Contact

Surveillance and Big Brother

23/03/2020 By ACOMSDave Leave a Comment

On December 14, 2019 Annalee Newitz in the New Scientist wrote:

‘Who owns your face? Smart doorbells containing cameras can be fun, but we can’t be sure what pictures of our faces are used for – and that’s just the tip of the iceberg’

Big Brother and Facial Recognition

The data captured by these devices is uploaded to server farms where the data is mined for the ‘better-good’ of the company supplying the device, ‘but also for you’; but does the use of data end there?  The answer is no, for the data can be access with your authority if you own a device by police and other services, and obviously governments are taking a high (low) level interest in this data.

The problem is that the police and other government agencies who access this data will do so and then run facial recognition software, which is currently very unreliable, particularly when it comes to people of colour.  Obviously, the tech companies are working on shortening this gap, and they are thinking outside the box to do so (like Google hiring a contractor to take photographs of the homeless to increase the range of their app)

But it is not just tech companies, it is also governments.  When you have a chance research the deal that the Chinese government struck with the Zimbabwe government to do amass surveillance of the faces of Zimbabweans; and there are other things that the Chinese government have done that really make you despair for the human race and its civil liberties.

Big Brother and CCTV

As a sideline to this article, tucked in a side strip on page seven of the New Scientist, was an article about a DNA site being sold to a firm aiding the police.  The GEDmatch site has more than 1.2 million people and their results stored there, and the US police used this site to trace a suspected serial killer, and this site has been bought by Verogen whose CEO, Brett Williams, stated:

‘…a vision for the site that focuses on solving crimes, not just connecting family members via DNA’

obviously, he and his team foresee a very lucrative market in government and government agency circles.

India has also announced that it wants (intends) to build one of the largest facial recognition systems in the world.  The question must be asked what is the Indian Government’s reason?  Also, considering my note on facial recognition software being unreliable for people of colour, what does this really mean for a country which has major problems inherently with the social groups who live in the country?

Maya Wang at Human Rights watch, said:

…The proposed system won’t just affect privacy, it will have a chilling effect on people’s willingness to exercise other rights, such as freedom of assembly or expression…

In George Orwell’s story “1984” he used the phrase ‘Big Brother is Watching You’.  The phrase referred to the government’ surveillance of the people (by the people and for the people) by a myriad of techniques including listening devices and cameras.  This was reinforced through the use of posters used by the government to reinforce that the government wants complete obedience…

The phrase has since become a symbolic representation of dictators and dictatorial regimes … but people don’t say this phrase outwardly in those regimes!

Now today’s government will site the fact of global terrorism and their need for ‘Big Brother’ techniques to combat, but one must ask at what cost to our rights and civil liberties. Where and what point do we say enough is enough, or will it be too late when we do say it, will the barn door be blown away and the horse long gone?

The European Union is considering banning facial recognition for up to five years, however with Brexit being undertaken by the UK it is more than conceivable that Westminster and all the various government quangos will jump quickly (and quietly) on the band wagon to say they urgently need this technology now that we have to go on our own.  Will this also have an impact on our border relationships with Ireland the border between North and South?

But where did CCTV start?

In October 1942, German engineers led by Wernher von Braun, sat in a remote control watching a television screen and monitored the test of the V2 (the Vergeltungswaffe or “vengeance weapon”.  This control room was situated some 2.5km (1.4 miles) away from the launch pad.  So why is this the birth of CCTV and monitoring ‘Big Brother’ style; from these modest beginnings that monitoring developed to the extent it is today. 

C10/V-2

…the pictures in that control room were the first example of a video feed being used not for broadcasting, but for real-time monitoring, in private – over a so-called “closed circuit”.  Tim Hartford (Jan 2020).

CCTV was the start of what has now developed into an extremely large and lucrative industry for some, and the demolishing of civil liberties for many.

Big Brother
  1. How worried should we be about ‘Big Brother’ technology?
  2. Meadowhall facial recognition scheme troubles watchdog
  3. Who owns your face?
  4. DNA site GEDmatch sold to firm helping US police solve crime

Filed Under: Community Journalist Tagged With: CCTV, China

Civil Liberties – is the legacy living on?

02/09/2013 By David McFarlane Leave a Comment

Martin Luther King jnr
 

Over the last few weeks papers, television and radio have been referring to Martin Luther King jnr’s speech ‘I have a dream’ which was delivered in Washington on August 28, 1963.

The speech was the high point of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom; which in itself became the focal point of a campaign against discrimination, voting restrictions, unfair treatment by the police and statutory barriers against social mobility and economic opportunity.
The impact of this speech was felt across America, and then across the world, and whilst MLK was not initially billed as the main speaker, his speech has now become synonymous with Civil Rights, and led within two years to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the 1965 Voting Rights Act being passed in the USA.
Rustin Bayard and Martin Luther King jnrMLK developed his commitment to a principle of non-violent action through the tutelage of Bayard Rustin, a man March on Washington Aug 28who was black, gay, and a Quaker.  Bayard’s own life had been through many phases. Bayard was brought up by his grandparents acting as his parents, who were methodists ( he later found out that his ‘sister’ was his mother).  He was a member of the Young Communist League until 1941 after the Nazi invasion of Russia led the U.S. party to switch gears into building American opposition to fascism, and racial justice issues fell by the wayside.
Rustin was a deeply committed pacifist, owing largely to his Quaker background, and got thrown in jail for conscientiously objecting to service in World War II. It was his introduction of Gandhi’s tactics of nonviolent resistance (which he learned when visiting independence activists in India) to the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr which served as a platform for MLK’s enduring success in civil liberties along with his oratory.
Bayard being gay, and also that he had been arrested for 1953 and sentenced under the lesser charge of ‘sex perversion’, was often used by his enemies both in the establishment and in the civil liberties camp as an indication of his unsuitability.  However, it is interesting to read the FBI synopsis on him:
Federal Bureau of Investigation internal memorandum (25th January, 1966)
Rustin is a very competent individual who is widely known in the civil rights field. He is personally familiar with numerous individuals with communist backgrounds. As one of Martin Luther King’s closest advisers, he is in a position to wield considerable influence on King’s activities. Technical coverage of Rustin is an important part of the overall coverage of King, who is the most prominent civil rights in the country today. Because of the influence being exerted on King by persons with subversive backgrounds, it is necessary for us to maintain coverage of individuals such as Rustin. In order to fulfill the Bureau’s responsibilities to uncover communist influence in racial matters, it is recommended that technical coverage of Rustin be continued.
Bayard SingsBayard Rustin, has been a man written out of history due to his abilities and to him being black and gay; fortunately society has moved on today, and more importantly the USA has a black president who this year has recognised the importance of Bayard by awarding him Presidential Medal of Freedom earlier this month.
Unfortunately some 50 years after MLK’s speech, and it’s impact worldwide, I must report that civil liberties in the United Kingdom are under threat.  Our freedoms, whether we are of the LGBT community, black, white, religious or non-religious are important to us.  History has shown that we must fight and succor our civil liberties; that we must not allow governments to sequester them int he pursuit of security.  So having said this how do we in one of the first democracies of the world now have one and a half times as many surveillance cameras as communist China (Tom Kelly, Mail Online,  Aug 2009).  According to the Association of Chief Police Officers,  as at Aug 2011, there are in actuality 1.85 million CCTV cameras in the united kingdom.
To this we can also see the implementation of ‘Stop and Search’.  In June of this year, it was stated that there were a million stops each year, with only 9% leading to court cases (BBC, July 2, 2013).  However an article in the Sunday Post dated August 25, 2013, said that in the last year the Scottish Police have actioned six hundred and twelve thousand (612,000) stop and searches in the last year – approximately a 50% increase, with only thirteen percent (13%) possibly finding anything!
I do not believe that England and Wales only did 400,000 stop and searches over this period, and looking back a few years ago I wrote about the police tactics of stopping people and confiscating cameras and videos during various times of unrest ‘in the interest of the public’. A tactic which has since been clarified as being unjustified.
Our civil liberties belong to us:
Civil liberties in the United Kingdom have a long and formative history. This is usually considered to have begun with the English legal charter the Magna Carta of 1215, following its predecessor the English Charter of Liberties, a landmark document in English legal history.  However it could be argued that the Declaration of Arbroath of 1320 in Scotland was the first attempted implementation of civil liberties in part of the United Kingdom.  Today the United Kingdom’s relationship to civil liberties has been mediated through its membership of the European Convention on Human Rights.
In other words, civil liberties are the “rights” or “freedoms” which underpin democracy. This usually means the right to vote, the right to life, the prohibition on torture, security of the person, the right to personal liberty and due process of law, freedom of expression and freedom of association.[3]
(Wikipedia, 2013)
I call upon everyone to monitor their police and security forces, their local and national government – don’t allow the United Kingdom to become a ‘police’ state.
banksy-search S&S KNow Your Rights
 
Further Reading:
Wikipedia –Civil Liberties in the United Kingdom
Wikipedia – Bayard Rustin
The Atlantic – Article by Kerry Eleveld ‘Obama, Bayard Rustin, and the New LGBT Civil Rights Movement‘
Spartacus Educational – Bayard Rustin
Washington Post – Wonkblog – Meet Bayard Rustin, the gay socialist pacifist who planned the 1963 march on Washington

Filed Under: Anti-Bullying & Homophobia, History Tagged With: bayard rustin, CCTV, civil, civil libeties, liberties, martin luther king jnr, stop & search, stop and search

Categories

Copyright ACOMSDave.com © 2026